Scale Issues in Remote Sensing 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781118801628.ch15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperspectral Remote Sensing with Emphasis on Land Cover Mapping: From Ground to Satellite Observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the upper left and upper right and bottom right patches in January 2014 ( Figure 6) were white flowering plants in February 2013 ( Figure 5). Since we used canopy-level hyperspectral data, the shape and geometry of flowering tree species could have affected the spectral responses of flowering classes [9,58] and hence the mapping accuracy of these classes. We applied a pixel-based classification approach which often leads to a "salt-and-pepper" pattern in the mapping result [59][60][61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the upper left and upper right and bottom right patches in January 2014 ( Figure 6) were white flowering plants in February 2013 ( Figure 5). Since we used canopy-level hyperspectral data, the shape and geometry of flowering tree species could have affected the spectral responses of flowering classes [9,58] and hence the mapping accuracy of these classes. We applied a pixel-based classification approach which often leads to a "salt-and-pepper" pattern in the mapping result [59][60][61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectral confusion is compounded in semi-arid biomes where bi-directional scattering between sub-pixel elements can be very high (Petropoulos, Manevski, & Carlson, 2014).…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was only in 2017-2018 that National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) acquired Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer Next Generation (AVIRIS NG) data over Alaska's boreal forests [19]. The HySpex airborne data set, such as presented in this pilot study, complements the NASA AVIRIS NG dataset and has the advantage that it can be collected locally at targeted sites with a greater and controlled frequency, and at lower costs than the NASA AVIRIS NG dataset [20]. The campaign also has other general advantages and disadvantages of airborne remote sensing for wetland mapping [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%