2017
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperspectral reflectance as a tool to measure biochemical and physiological traits in wheat

Abstract: Leaf hyperspectral reflectance can be used by the wheat physiology and breeding communities to rapidly estimate Rubisco activity, electron transport rate, leaf nitrogen, leaf dry mass per area, and relative chlorophyll content.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
190
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
13
190
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our ability to predict R dark might be an indirect reflection of photosynthesis. Considering that the light saturated ambient rate of photosynthesis and the two major determinants of photosynthetic performance— V c,max and J max —can also be predicted from leaf reflectance (Ainsworth et al, ; Barnes et al, ; Dechant et al, ; Doughty et al, ; Heckmann, Schlüter, & Weber, ; Serbin et al, ; Silva‐Pérez et al, ; Yendrek et al, ), one possibility is that variations in R dark are coupled to variations in V c,max and/or J max and that the ability to predict R dark from leaf reflectance is, in part, due to spectral signatures of key photosynthetic components. Dechant et al () reported that the prediction of V c,max 25 from leaf reflectance is a secondary one, driven primarily by the prediction of leaf N. However, because the prediction of R dark here for wheat using N area , LMA, or their combination was poor (for R dark_LA , highest r 2 = 0.12) compared with the PLSR model (see Table S6 for multiple regression results for R dark_LA ), our success in predicting R dark indicates that there is additional information contained within the reflectance spectra associated with R dark.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our ability to predict R dark might be an indirect reflection of photosynthesis. Considering that the light saturated ambient rate of photosynthesis and the two major determinants of photosynthetic performance— V c,max and J max —can also be predicted from leaf reflectance (Ainsworth et al, ; Barnes et al, ; Dechant et al, ; Doughty et al, ; Heckmann, Schlüter, & Weber, ; Serbin et al, ; Silva‐Pérez et al, ; Yendrek et al, ), one possibility is that variations in R dark are coupled to variations in V c,max and/or J max and that the ability to predict R dark from leaf reflectance is, in part, due to spectral signatures of key photosynthetic components. Dechant et al () reported that the prediction of V c,max 25 from leaf reflectance is a secondary one, driven primarily by the prediction of leaf N. However, because the prediction of R dark here for wheat using N area , LMA, or their combination was poor (for R dark_LA , highest r 2 = 0.12) compared with the PLSR model (see Table S6 for multiple regression results for R dark_LA ), our success in predicting R dark indicates that there is additional information contained within the reflectance spectra associated with R dark.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor model performance across experiments is not uncommon. Silva‐Pérez et al () reported that models derived from field‐grown aspen leaves ( Populus tremuloides Michx. ; Serbin et al, ) gave poor predictions when applied to wheat leaves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations