Advanced Environmental, Chemical, and Biological Sensing Technologies XV 2019
DOI: 10.1117/12.2517070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperspectral imaging applied to asbestos containing materials detection: specimen preparation and handling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the number of the acquired samples, the noise effect will be reduced, thanks to the increase of spectral data set representative of each class. result does not negatively affect ACM identification, they also highlights how low spectral resolution generates more noise in prediction than that produced according to different set up adopted in our previous studies [20,36,39]. Increasing the number of the acquired samples, the noise effect will be reduced, thanks to the increase of spectral data set representative of each class.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Increasing the number of the acquired samples, the noise effect will be reduced, thanks to the increase of spectral data set representative of each class. result does not negatively affect ACM identification, they also highlights how low spectral resolution generates more noise in prediction than that produced according to different set up adopted in our previous studies [20,36,39]. Increasing the number of the acquired samples, the noise effect will be reduced, thanks to the increase of spectral data set representative of each class.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The analysis of Figure 8c clearly shows as the unclassified pixels are due to the "border effect" present in all the analyzed samples and to the class NC (i.e., not classified individuals), that a class of material not containing asbestos (i.e., drywall) but, at the same time, not belonging, for their detected spectral attributes, to any of the previously defined classes, that is: AGGREGATES MORTAR AND BRICK, FIBER GLASS and ORGANIC. Although the obtained result does not negatively affect ACM identification, they also highlights how low spectral resolution generates more noise in prediction than that produced according to different set up adopted in our previous studies [20,36,39]. Increasing the number of the acquired samples, the noise effect will be reduced, thanks to the increase of spectral data set representative of each class.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four pure asbestos samples (Chrysotile standard intermediate 031G, Chrysotile standard NIEHS plastibest 20, Amosite Standard 312M, Amosite standard NIEHS, Crocidolite standard 5174, Crocidolite from Balangero industrial plant, and 'matrix without asbestos'), provided by National Institute for Insurance against Accidents at Work (INAIL) (Rome, Italy), were analyzed in order to create a calibration and validation set (Figure 1). The samples were sealed up in borosilicate glass Petri cups as showed in Figure 1 (Serranti et al, 2019). Furthermore, three asbestos certified samples constituted by amosite, chrysotile and crocidolite fibers were acquired.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-earthquake Building Waste (PBW) belong to the category of Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) are mainly composed of materials like concrete, glass, asphalt, wood and also some hazardous materials like asbestos, still present in old buildings built before its ban in 1975 (Tabata et al, 2022). Asbestos is a fibrous mineral widely used in a variety of building materials due to its extraordinary tensile strength and resistance to heat and corrosion (Gualtieri, 2017;Paglietti et al, 2019). However, it causes serious diseases such as lung cancer, mesothelioma (Azuma et al, 2009) and asbestosis (EPA, 2020a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%