2018
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2018.2823419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperspectral Image Unmixing With LiDAR Data-Aided Spatial Regularization

Abstract: Spectral unmixing methods incorporating spatial regularizations have demonstrated increasing interest. Although spatial regularizers which promote smoothness of the abundance maps have been widely used, they may overly smooth these maps and, in particular, may not preserve edges present in the hyperspectral image. Existing unmixing methods usually ignore these edge structures or use edge information derived from the hyperspectral image itself. However, this information may be affected by large amounts of noise… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the general ill-conditioning of the endmember matrix M, the objective function underlying (1) is often granted with additional regularizations promoting expected properties of the solution. In particular, numerous works exploited the expected spatial behavior of the mixing coefficients to introduce spatial regularizations enforcing piecewise-constant [5], [8] or smoothly varying [3], [19] abundance maps, possibly driven by external knowledge [20]. Conversely, this work does not consider spatial information as a prior knowledge but rather proposes a decomposition model dedicated to the image spatial content, paving the way towards the concept of spatial unmixing.…”
Section: A Spectral Mixing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the general ill-conditioning of the endmember matrix M, the objective function underlying (1) is often granted with additional regularizations promoting expected properties of the solution. In particular, numerous works exploited the expected spatial behavior of the mixing coefficients to introduce spatial regularizations enforcing piecewise-constant [5], [8] or smoothly varying [3], [19] abundance maps, possibly driven by external knowledge [20]. Conversely, this work does not consider spatial information as a prior knowledge but rather proposes a decomposition model dedicated to the image spatial content, paving the way towards the concept of spatial unmixing.…”
Section: A Spectral Mixing Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weights β m,n can be computed beforehand to adjust the penalizations with respect to expected spatial variations of the scene. They can be estimated directly from the image to be analyzed or extracted from a complementary dataset as in [47]. They will be specified during the experiments reported in Section 4.…”
Section: Quadratic Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weighting coefficients β m,n are introduced to account for the natural boundaries present in the image. They are computed beforehand using external data containing information on the spatial structures, e.g., a panchromatic image or a LIDAR image [11]. An example of such weights is described in Section IV.…”
Section: B Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%