2019
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2019.2907598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperspectral Image Clustering Based on Unsupervised Broad Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kong et al [40] proposed a semisupervised model by merging the class-probability structure into BLS and achieved good classification performance in HSI classification. Kong et al [41] proposed a HSI clustering algorithm based on BLS, and exploited the graph-regularized sparse autoencoder to fine-tune the weights of MF and EN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kong et al [40] proposed a semisupervised model by merging the class-probability structure into BLS and achieved good classification performance in HSI classification. Kong et al [41] proposed a HSI clustering algorithm based on BLS, and exploited the graph-regularized sparse autoencoder to fine-tune the weights of MF and EN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the success of deep clustering, the pioneer work of deep HSI clustering method, namely LSSD, is proposed in [1] and the discriminative deep embedding of HSI samples are learned by training a siamese network based on the (dis)similar sample pairs derived from the set-to-set and sample-to-sample distances. The unsupervised broad learning is first applied for HSI clustering by using a graph regularized sparse autoencoder [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kong et al [33] merged the class-probability structure into BLS to obtain a semi-supervised learning version, which achieves a high accuracy in HSI classification. Kong et al [34] fine-tuned the weights of MF and EN with the graphregularized sparse autoencoder, which maintained the manifold structure of original data. However, both the above two HSI classification methods cannot help to improve the HSI classification accuracy by utilizing vast quantities of labeled samples in related domains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%