1994
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112094002089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypersonic boundary-layer separation on a cold wall

Abstract: An asymptotic theory of laminar hypersonic boundary-layer separation for large Reynolds number is described for situations when the surface temperature is small compared with the stagnation temperature of the inviscid external gas flow. The interactive boundary-layer structure near separation is described by well-known tripledeck concepts but, in contrast to the usual situation, the displacement thickness associated with the viscous sublayer is too small to influence the external pressure distribution (to lead… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
31
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
10
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, for stable flows, wall cooling was found to limit either the upstream or the downstream propagation of disturbances and thereby have a dramatic effect on both the location and size of the recirculation zone. Finally, the present numerical results were found to blend smoothly with those in regime 3 predicted by the analytic theory of Kerimbekov et al (1994) for strong wall cooling.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, for stable flows, wall cooling was found to limit either the upstream or the downstream propagation of disturbances and thereby have a dramatic effect on both the location and size of the recirculation zone. Finally, the present numerical results were found to blend smoothly with those in regime 3 predicted by the analytic theory of Kerimbekov et al (1994) for strong wall cooling.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The third regime is characterized by very low wall temperatures where the displacement-thickness contribution due to the main deck is dominant. This situation has been considered recently by Kerimbekov et al (1994) for subcritical and supercritical boundary layers that encounter a compression ramp. For the limiting case of strong supercritical wall cooling, it was found that there are no disturbances upstream of the corner, and separation can only occur on the inclined portion of the ramp; furthermore, the boundary layer on the ramp exhibits marginal separation behaviour similar to that which is known to occur near the leading edge of thin airfoils at a critical angle of attack (Ruban 1981and Stewartson, Smith & Kaups 1982.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first, near the wall, is a rotational viscous subsonic region which is most sensitive to disturbances, the second is a main inviscid rotational region and the third is an inviscid irrotational outer region, which is most resistive to disturbances. Interaction between these decks (Stewartson 1974) has been shown to be dependent on wall temperature by a number of authors such as Brown, Cheng & Lee (1990), Seddougui, Bowles & Smith (1991), Kerimbekov, Ruban & Walker (1994), Cassel, Ruban & Walker (1995), Cassel, Ruban & Walker (1996), Neiland, Sokolov & Shvedchenko (2009) and Shvedchenko (2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only circumstance when the assumption T w 1 is no longer valid arises when strong cooling is applied to the cone surface. Studies of the effects of severe cooling include those by Seddougui, Bowles & Smith (1991) for general compressible flows and investigations by Brown, Cheng & Lee (1990) and Kerimbekov, Ruban & Walker (1994) for hypersonic flows. Hereafter we shall suppose that T w = T b T r where T r is the adiabatic wall temperature given by…”
Section: Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%