2003
DOI: 10.1309/drfq-0wfu-f1g1-3ctk
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperplastic-like Colon Polyps That Preceded Microsatellite-Unstable Adenocarcinomas

Abstract: We compared hyperplastic-like polyps that preceded microsatellite-unstable adenocarcinomas to incidental hyperplastic polyps to identify distinguishing morphologic criteria. The study group included 106 hyperplastic-like, nonadenomatous, serrated polyps, most from the ascending colon in 91 patients; the control group included 106 rectosigmoid hyperplastic polyps from 106 patients in whom adenocarcinoma did not develop. Study group polyps had an expanded crypt proliferative zone, a serrated architectural outlin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
4
73
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These phenotypic differences between CIMP+ and CIMP− microsatellite-unstable tumors reflect not only a difference in gene expression profiles between them but also a difference in the morphological multistep progression pathways. Hereditary MSI+ CRCs are known to develop through tubular adenomas with or without villosity [30], whereas CIMP+/ MSI+ CRCs are generally thought to arise on a background of sessile serrated adenoma [10,31,32]. However, it needs to be pointed out that although there were statistical differences in some of the histological features, there is great overlap between categories, and some of the features are more or less common in the MSI cases regardless of CIMP status (for example, signet ring appearance shows a significant difference; yet, it is a feature which is absent in a vast majority of both CIMP− and CIMP+ carcinomas (3.7% and 27%, respectively)); hence, these features are of much clinical or diagnostic significance.…”
Section: Survival Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These phenotypic differences between CIMP+ and CIMP− microsatellite-unstable tumors reflect not only a difference in gene expression profiles between them but also a difference in the morphological multistep progression pathways. Hereditary MSI+ CRCs are known to develop through tubular adenomas with or without villosity [30], whereas CIMP+/ MSI+ CRCs are generally thought to arise on a background of sessile serrated adenoma [10,31,32]. However, it needs to be pointed out that although there were statistical differences in some of the histological features, there is great overlap between categories, and some of the features are more or less common in the MSI cases regardless of CIMP status (for example, signet ring appearance shows a significant difference; yet, it is a feature which is absent in a vast majority of both CIMP− and CIMP+ carcinomas (3.7% and 27%, respectively)); hence, these features are of much clinical or diagnostic significance.…”
Section: Survival Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic criteria for SSAs were based on the recently published criteria relying mainly on polyp architecture [10,23,24]. The architectural features which were assessed included crypt branching, horizontal dilatation of basal crypts and presence of serration at the base of the crypts.…”
Section: Selection Criteria For Ssas and Tasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are also frequently associated with BRAF mutations and abnormal DNA methylation [5][6][7]. SSAs are thus considered to be precursors of some populations of microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) colorectal carcinomas [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%