2012
DOI: 10.2176/nmc.52.902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Stent Placement for Subclavian Artery Stenosis

Abstract: A 60-year-old woman presented with a rare case of hyperperfusion syndrome after stent placement for subclavian artery stenosis manifesting as dizziness due to vertebrobasilar insufficiency. Three days after undergoing stent placement to treat the severely stenotic (90%) right subclavian artery, she suffered intracranial hemorrhage related to hyperperfusion syndrome. Preoperative single-photon emission computed tomography findings of low cerebral perfusion and poor perfusion reserve might indicate the possibili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as in carotid revascularization, a sudden increase in the intracranial blood flow following the subclavian stenting may create a risk of rupture for the concomitant posterior circulation aneurysm. In our literature review, we could find no cases of intracranial aneurysm rupture following subclavian stenting, but intracranial hemorrhage due to hyperperfusion was reported in two patients (30,31). Therefore, it is necessary to secure the ipsilateral intracranial aneurysm in patients for whom subclavian artery stenting is planned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Moreover, as in carotid revascularization, a sudden increase in the intracranial blood flow following the subclavian stenting may create a risk of rupture for the concomitant posterior circulation aneurysm. In our literature review, we could find no cases of intracranial aneurysm rupture following subclavian stenting, but intracranial hemorrhage due to hyperperfusion was reported in two patients (30,31). Therefore, it is necessary to secure the ipsilateral intracranial aneurysm in patients for whom subclavian artery stenting is planned.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…CHS can develop at any time; immediately after the procedure to up to a month later, but the majority of patients develop symptoms within the first few days (mean 5 days) 7,20,21 . Although this most commonly appears after CAS and CEA, CHS was described and after the subclavian artery stenting 20 and after the endovascular reconstruction of carotid artery in a high-flow carotid-jugular fistula 21 . The reported incidence rate of CHS and ICH after CEA is 1.9% and 0.37% and 1.16% and 0.74% after CAS 3,6,7,[10][11][12]22 .…”
Section: Clinical Presentation Risk Factors and Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is caused by a sudden increase in blood flow to an under-perfuse region of the brain, leading to brain tissue edema and secondary hemorrhage (the risk of intracranial hemorrhage in stent angioplasties is 1.2%), both of which can be fatal [37]. The risk raise as the degree of stenosis increases.…”
Section: Magnetic Mediated Nano-particle Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%