1980
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1980.03300290028015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperparathyroidism and Pancreatitis

Abstract: Of 1,153 patients with surgically confirmed primary hyperparathyroidism operated on at the Mayo Clinic between 1950 and 1975, only 17 (1.5%) had coexisting or prior pancreatitis. This frequency of association approximates the reported incidence of pancreatitis among general hospital patient populations. Other factors of possible etiologic significance in pancreatitis, such as gallstones or alcohol abuse, were present in 11 of the 17 patients. Cure of the hyperparathyroidism was usually not associated with amel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that the calculated incidence of acute pancreatitis among PHPT patients was actually lower than a randomly selected group of control subjects with PHPT; it was 114 per 100,000 person-years versus 140 per 100,000 person-years among the controls. The overall rate of pancreatitis with PHPT (1.5%) was as low as that reported by Bess et al 20 Even though there seems to be a 10-year overlap of the same patient population between the 2 studies, if we count each of them independently, a cumulative rate of pancreatitis among these and the other large studies, weighted by patient number, comes approximately to 3.6%. The number is still higher than the 2.3% incidence of pancreatitis reported among the control non-PHPT patients by Khoo and colleagues.…”
Section: Association Between Phpt and Pancreatitiscontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They found that the calculated incidence of acute pancreatitis among PHPT patients was actually lower than a randomly selected group of control subjects with PHPT; it was 114 per 100,000 person-years versus 140 per 100,000 person-years among the controls. The overall rate of pancreatitis with PHPT (1.5%) was as low as that reported by Bess et al 20 Even though there seems to be a 10-year overlap of the same patient population between the 2 studies, if we count each of them independently, a cumulative rate of pancreatitis among these and the other large studies, weighted by patient number, comes approximately to 3.6%. The number is still higher than the 2.3% incidence of pancreatitis reported among the control non-PHPT patients by Khoo and colleagues.…”
Section: Association Between Phpt and Pancreatitiscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Firstly, Bess et al 20 argue that it is generally difficult to draw correlations between the 2 disorders among hospitalized patients because of measurement bias. Most cases of detectable PHPT are asymptomatic until late stage.…”
Section: Association Between Phpt and Pancreatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the association between PHPT and acute pancreatitis, apart from that related to hypercalcaemia per se, remains to be established 113 .…”
Section: Diagnosis Screening and Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our patients aza thioprine was stopped when acute pancreatitis was diag nosed and cyclophosphamide substituted. Hyperparathy roidism has been suggested as a cause of pancreatitis pos sibly due to activation of pancreatic trypsin by calcium ions [17,18], However, a review of 1,153 patients at the Mayo Clinic with primary hyperparathyroidism failed to show an above normal incidence of pancreatitis [19], Infections, particularly those viral in origin, are known to be a cause of pancreatitis and in the immunocomprom ised host this occurs more commonly. During the process of renal allograft rejection the antibodies produced against the transplant are known to be reactive against other tissues and it has been suggested that an autoim mune vasculitis of the pancreas may be a result of the rejection process [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%