2016
DOI: 10.1140/epja/i2016-16034-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperon elastic electromagnetic form factors in the space-like momentum region

Abstract: Abstract. We present a calculation of the electric and magnetic form factors of ground-state octet and decuplet baryons including strange quarks. We work with a combination of Dyson-Schwinger equations for the quark propagator and covariant Bethe-Salpeter equations describing baryons as bound states of three (non-perturbative) quarks. Our form factors for the octet baryons are in good agreement with corresponding lattice data at finite Q 2 ; deviations in some isospin channels for the magnetic moments can be e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(150 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lattice results were obtained at unphysical pion masses and extrapolated to the physical point using partially quenched chiral perturbation theory. We show these results for the Σ and Ξ isomultiplets and compare with the corresponding DSE results from [489] as well as with the experimental values for the magnetic moments [9]. In interpreting the differences between these results it proves useful to make use of the works cited above [635,636] on the role played (such as sign of the effect, its magnitude, etc.)…”
Section: Hyperon Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The lattice results were obtained at unphysical pion masses and extrapolated to the physical point using partially quenched chiral perturbation theory. We show these results for the Σ and Ξ isomultiplets and compare with the corresponding DSE results from [489] as well as with the experimental values for the magnetic moments [9]. In interpreting the differences between these results it proves useful to make use of the works cited above [635,636] on the role played (such as sign of the effect, its magnitude, etc.)…”
Section: Hyperon Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Keeping in mind that the extraction of G E2 and G M 3 for very low Q 2 is numerically difficult (as explained in [489]), the DSE calculation predicts a prolate shape (positive G E 2 ) for the charge distribution in Σ * + and an oblate one (negative sign) for the Σ * − . In the case of the Σ * 0 one obtains a zero crossing at Q 2 ∼ 0.7 GeV 2 , the charge distribution changing from an oblate to a prolate shape as the electromagnetic probe increases in energy.…”
Section: Hyperon Form Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations