2014
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1400179111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypermutable DNA chronicles the evolution of human colon cancer

Abstract: Intratumor genetic heterogeneity reflects the evolutionary history of a cancer and is thought to influence treatment outcomes. Here we report that a simple PCR-based assay interrogating somatic variation in hypermutable polyguanine (poly-G) repeats can provide a rapid and reliable assessment of mitotic history and clonal architecture in human cancer. We use poly-G repeat genotyping to study the evolution of colon carcinoma. In a cohort of 22 patients, we detect poly-G variants in 91% of tumors. Patient age is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(61 reference statements)
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After some specific methods are used in hundreds of studies, we hope that the results will be sufficiently robust and interpretable to aid in patient prognosis and treatment planning. Similarly, clinicians interpreting phylogenetic analyses should insist that different methods be tried and that results are actionable only when different methods of analysis lead to the same qualitative understanding of a patient’s tumour 68,106 .…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After some specific methods are used in hundreds of studies, we hope that the results will be sufficiently robust and interpretable to aid in patient prognosis and treatment planning. Similarly, clinicians interpreting phylogenetic analyses should insist that different methods be tried and that results are actionable only when different methods of analysis lead to the same qualitative understanding of a patient’s tumour 68,106 .…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the studies that concluded that there was little selection in some tumours looked mostly at SNVs and CNVs, but perhaps there is selection in those tumours via evolutionary mechanisms that would be apparent only when looking at other marker types, such as karyotypes or methylation patterns. Few studies have tested whether the phylogenetic inferences made are robust to a change of methods, with notable exceptions 68,106 .…”
Section: Overview Of Tumour Phylogeneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11–13 These subclones carry distinct sets of oncogenic driver mutations and other phylogenetic signatures of their unique, and ongoing, evolutionary history. 14,15 Subclonal mutations arise initially in a single cell; this cell can then expand to become a detectable minority population within the tumour. The mutations that confer a growth advantage—frequently referred to as ‘driver mutations’—can occur in concert with additional unselected mutations.…”
Section: Tumour Heterogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups have even suggested that genetic tumor heterogeneity might explain why the success stories of biomarker discovery and identification of drug targets are modestly small to date [78][79][80] . The emerging picture is now that almost every major cancer of the digestive system, including CRC [81] , PDAC [56] , esophageal carcinoma and its precursors [82,83] , CC [84] , and HCC [85] , is composed of more than one tumor cell clone. The degree of genetic heterogeneity, however, appears to be quite variable.…”
Section: Genetic Heterogeneity Of Tumors Of the Digestive System And mentioning
confidence: 99%