2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00776-8_71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypergraph-Based Discrete Hashing Learning for Cross-Modal Retrieval

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By whether the label information is utilized, cross-modal hashing (CMH) methods can be categorized into two subclasses: unsupervised [15][16][17][18][19][20] and supervised [21][22][23][24][25] methods. The details are shown in Section II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…By whether the label information is utilized, cross-modal hashing (CMH) methods can be categorized into two subclasses: unsupervised [15][16][17][18][19][20] and supervised [21][22][23][24][25] methods. The details are shown in Section II.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, most existing CMH methods take graphs, which are always predefined separately in each modality, as input to model the distribution of data. These methods omit to consider the correlation of graph structure among multiple modalities, and cross-modal retrieval results highly rely on the quality of predefined affinity graphs [15,16,18]. Secondly, most existing CMH methods deal with the preservation of intra-and inter-modal affinity separately to learn the binary code, omitting to consider the fusion affinity among multimodalities data containing complementary information [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations