2015
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.115.010557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperglycemia and PPARγ Antagonistically Influence Macrophage Polarization and Infarct Healing After Ischemic Stroke

Abstract: Background and Purpose-Secondary intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) is a potentially serious complication of ischemic stroke, in particular under concomitant oral anticoagulation. Previous studies in murine stroke models defined a novel vascular repair function of hematogenous monocytes/macrophages (MO/MP), which proved essential for the prevention of oral anticoagulation-associated sICH. Here, we addressed the question whether hyperglycemia as a clinically relevant prohemorrhagic risk factor and peroxisome proli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On a physiological and radiological level, stress hyperglycemia has been associated with a larger infarct volume on presentation, and might contribute to poorer stroke recovery through impairment of the fibrinolytic process and delayed reperfusion of the ischemic penumbra. In animal studies, stress hyperglycemia appears to induce further cerebral damage by inducing a pro‐inflammatory response, exacerbating brain edema surrounding intracranial hemorrhage, disrupting the blood–brain barrier and increasing the risk of hemorrhagic transformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a physiological and radiological level, stress hyperglycemia has been associated with a larger infarct volume on presentation, and might contribute to poorer stroke recovery through impairment of the fibrinolytic process and delayed reperfusion of the ischemic penumbra. In animal studies, stress hyperglycemia appears to induce further cerebral damage by inducing a pro‐inflammatory response, exacerbating brain edema surrounding intracranial hemorrhage, disrupting the blood–brain barrier and increasing the risk of hemorrhagic transformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They signal a huge amount of M1 macrophages to rush to the site of cardiac injury to initiate cardiac remodeling [51]. Once this initial period passes, a second set comprising STAT-6, IRF-4, and PPAR-α reaches the injury site.…”
Section: The Role Of Macrophages In Different Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The classic M1 phenotype of microglia/macrophages triggers injurious responses, whereas alternatively activated M2 phenotypes scavenge debris and promote angiogenesis, tissue remodeling, and repair. [7][8][9][10][11] Intriguingly, although neutrophils have classically been regarded as detrimental, being correlated with poor histological and functional outcomes after stroke, [12][13][14][15][16] recent findings suggest that brain recruitment of N2 phenotypes may provide beneficial effects. 17,18 Thus, a strategic approach to rescue ischemic brain injury would consist in promoting polarization shifts toward M2 or N2 phenotypes, while reducing activation of pro-inflammatory phenotypes during the acute phase after stroke.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%