2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperfine structure, lifetime and oscillator strength of V II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 2 , we have gathered the radial integral values of n d k ( n + 1)s -> n d k ( n + 1)p transitions, obtained semi-empirically in our previous works, using the same code, for singly ionized atoms, such as V II [21] , Zr II [22] , Nb II [23] , Rh II [24] , Hf II [25] to which we have added those given by Ruczkowski et al for Sc II [16] and Ti II [26] . It is easy to observe that these transition radial integral values decrease with the filling of n d-shells for the same principal quantum number; this behaviour is different for instance from established general trends in the hyperfine structure analyses: increasing (contrary to the transition radial integral which is rather decreasing) of the most influential s-monoelectronic hfs parameter divided by g I = μ I / I , a 10 ns / g I versus atomic number Z [27] .…”
Section: Oscillator Strength Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 2 , we have gathered the radial integral values of n d k ( n + 1)s -> n d k ( n + 1)p transitions, obtained semi-empirically in our previous works, using the same code, for singly ionized atoms, such as V II [21] , Zr II [22] , Nb II [23] , Rh II [24] , Hf II [25] to which we have added those given by Ruczkowski et al for Sc II [16] and Ti II [26] . It is easy to observe that these transition radial integral values decrease with the filling of n d-shells for the same principal quantum number; this behaviour is different for instance from established general trends in the hyperfine structure analyses: increasing (contrary to the transition radial integral which is rather decreasing) of the most influential s-monoelectronic hfs parameter divided by g I = μ I / I , a 10 ns / g I versus atomic number Z [27] .…”
Section: Oscillator Strength Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally our investigation of singly ionized hafnium was extended by comparing our calculated oscillator strengths with available experimental data and by predicting new values for a rather large number of transitions. We hope that this work, in the image of our previous studies [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], will constitute a good stimulus and a useful guide for experimenters to perform further spectroscopic measurements in this ion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Nevertheless we have to point out that 3d 4 5s levels were correctly assigned in previous studies and we have not changed any label of these levels. To compute oscillator strength values we used two different approaches, namely the HFR+CPOL model [9,10] and oscillator strength parameterization (OSP) method [11,12]. For the latter we need experimental data since transition radial integrals are treated as free parameters in the least squares fit to experimental gf values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%