2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10999-023-09673-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperelastic constitutive model parameters identification using optical-based techniques and hybrid optimisation

Saeed Mollaee,
David M. Budgett,
Andrew J. Taberner
et al.

Abstract: In this paper we propose a new optical-based technique to identify the constitutive relation coefficients of the hyperelastic material using a hybrid optimisation approach. This technique can be used in place of traditional mechanical testing of elastomers for applications that involve inhomogeneous deformation. The purpose of the proposed method is to identify the incompressible hyperelastic material constitutive relation coefficients using a single experiment under different loading cases. The method compris… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Material properties were measured, and constitutive laws appropriate to describe the elastomer systematically evaluated as previously described in detail in. 50 In accordance with the findings of our earlier study, we developed an Ogden model (N = 3) with coefficients of μ 1 = 12.1 kPa, μ 2 = 10.8 kPa, μ 3 = À2.8 kPa, α 1 = 3.34, α 2 = 4.08, and α 3 = 5.19. Based on the literature the typical friction coefficient observed between the residual limb and the socket is 0.5 ± 0.1.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 56%
“…Material properties were measured, and constitutive laws appropriate to describe the elastomer systematically evaluated as previously described in detail in. 50 In accordance with the findings of our earlier study, we developed an Ogden model (N = 3) with coefficients of μ 1 = 12.1 kPa, μ 2 = 10.8 kPa, μ 3 = À2.8 kPa, α 1 = 3.34, α 2 = 4.08, and α 3 = 5.19. Based on the literature the typical friction coefficient observed between the residual limb and the socket is 0.5 ± 0.1.…”
Section: F I G U R Ementioning
confidence: 56%
“… 10 , 11 However, the data given by the authors concern the formation of the femoral stump in animals and do not touch upon the issues of changes in the structural organisation of bone tissue under load in the prosthesis. Recently, the issues of optical identification of model parameters, 12 fabrication of pneumatic reconfigured sockets for proper stump fit, 13 and characterization of soft tissue features after tibial amputation 14 have been developed, which may in the future affect both bone structure and prosthetic outcomes. The available studies of the peroneal bone tissue after transtibial amputation only state the disturbance of bone formation in the form of acuminosity or club-like shape and phenomena of peroneal nerve neuritis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%