2013
DOI: 10.1080/03605302.2013.840790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypercontractivity and Asymptotic Behavior in Nonautonomous Kolmogorov Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also show a Poincaré inequality in L p (Ω, ν) for p ∈ [2, ∞) that together with the hypercontractivity estimate T Ω (t)f L p (Ω,ν) ≤ c p,q,Ω f L q (Ω,ν) which holds for any t > 0, f ∈ L q (Ω, ν) and some p > q, allows us to study the asymptotic behaviour of T Ω (t)f as t → +∞ for f ∈ L p (Ω, ν), p > 1, and to relate it to the behaviour of the derivative |D H T Ω (t)f | as t → +∞. This last result was already known in the finite dimensional setting for evolution operators associated to non-autonomous elliptic operator (see [3]). These estimates are drawn in a more or less standard way: we have presented sketches of proofs (or even complete proofs) for the convenience of the reader.Further consequences can be deduced, but these will be hopefully matter of other works.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also show a Poincaré inequality in L p (Ω, ν) for p ∈ [2, ∞) that together with the hypercontractivity estimate T Ω (t)f L p (Ω,ν) ≤ c p,q,Ω f L q (Ω,ν) which holds for any t > 0, f ∈ L q (Ω, ν) and some p > q, allows us to study the asymptotic behaviour of T Ω (t)f as t → +∞ for f ∈ L p (Ω, ν), p > 1, and to relate it to the behaviour of the derivative |D H T Ω (t)f | as t → +∞. This last result was already known in the finite dimensional setting for evolution operators associated to non-autonomous elliptic operator (see [3]). These estimates are drawn in a more or less standard way: we have presented sketches of proofs (or even complete proofs) for the convenience of the reader.Further consequences can be deduced, but these will be hopefully matter of other works.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Step 1. We use an idea of [37] (see also [3,Theorem 5.2]). Let f ∈ FC 1 b (Ω), η > 0 and consider the function f η = 1 + η(f − m Ω (f )).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for any t > s, f ∈ C 1 b (R d ) and q ∈ (1, +∞). 3) to hold are given in [3]. In particular, (4.3) holds true when (2.3) is satisfied with p = 1 (see Remark 2.2).…”
Section: Hypercontractivity Throughout This and The Forthcoming Subsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Comparatively, in [12] the Euclidean distance is used as reference distance and then a space only Lyapunov condition is sufficient for existence and uniqueness of an evolution system of measures. In [1,12] the coefficients in the Lyapunov condition are uniformly bounded, and as consequence a time-homogeneous process can be used for comparison with the original process. In our setting, the coefficients in the Lyapunov conditions need to be time-dependent to preserve the information about the varying space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for every s ∈ I, f ∈ H 1 (M, µ s ) and some positive decreasing function β s . Note that the function β s may depend on the current time s which generalizes the notion of super-log-Sobolev inequalities for non-autonomous systems on R d in [1]. Moreover, combining the super-log-Sobolev inequalities and dimension-free Harnack inequalities, we prove that the exponential integrability of radial function with respect to (µ t ) t∈I or (P s,t ) (s,t)∈Λ is equivalent to supercontractivity or ultraboundedness of the corresponding semigroup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%