1996
DOI: 10.1093/qjmath/47.188.389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypercomplex structures on a class of solvable lie groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the realm of hypercomplex manifolds is much broader than the one of hyperkähler manifolds. To cite but a few hypercomplex non-hyperkähler manifolds, note that some nilmanifolds, that is quotients of a nilpotent Lie group by a cocompact lattice, admit hypercomplex structures [5]. Furthermore, Dominic Joyce constructed many left-invariant hypercomplex structures on Lie groups [16] and similar ones have been analysed by physicists interested in string theory [30] in the context of N = 4 supersymmetry.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the realm of hypercomplex manifolds is much broader than the one of hyperkähler manifolds. To cite but a few hypercomplex non-hyperkähler manifolds, note that some nilmanifolds, that is quotients of a nilpotent Lie group by a cocompact lattice, admit hypercomplex structures [5]. Furthermore, Dominic Joyce constructed many left-invariant hypercomplex structures on Lie groups [16] and similar ones have been analysed by physicists interested in string theory [30] in the context of N = 4 supersymmetry.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If dim n = 1, according to [3,Theorem 4.1], n is isomorphic to n 1 or n 2 . If dim n = 2, since z is J-stable, then n = z and we have that dim z = 2.…”
Section: Dimension 6: the Nilpotent Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 4-dimensional compact manifold M = (Γ\N ) × S 1 = (Γ × Z)\(N × R) is known as the Kodaira-Thurston manifold. The Lie group N × R admits a left invariant abelian complex structure (see for instance [5,3]), and therefore M inherits a complex structure J admitting an abelian connection. On the other hand, M is not complex parallelizable.…”
Section: We Begin By Recalling Known Facts On Invariant Complex Strucmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connections ∇ 1 and ∇ 2 appearing in the proof of Proposition 2.2 are known, respectively, as the first and second canonical connection associated to the Hermitian manifold (M, J, g). The connection ∇ 2 is also known as the Chern connection, and it is the unique connection on (M, J, g) satisfying (5). In the almost Hermitian case, the Chern connection is the unique complex metric connection whose torsion is of type (2, 0) + (0, 2), equivalently, the (1, 1)-component of the torsion vanishes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%