In Lemma 3.9 of [2], we stated that acylindrical hyperbolicity of a group is invariant under commensurability up to finite kernels (for definitions and background material we refer to [2,4]). This lemma was used to prove some of the main results in [2] and the subsequent paper [4]. Unfortunately, its proof contains a gap. The goal of this erratum is to point out the gap and correct the statements and proofs of results of [2,4] affected by it. The arXiv versions of the papers [2,4] will be updated accordingly. 1.1 The gap The arguments given in [2] correctly prove some parts of Lemma 3.9, which are summarized below. Lemma 1 Let H be an acylindrically hyperbolic group. Suppose that G is a finite index subgroup of H , or a quotient of H modulo a finite normal subgroup, or an extension of H with finite kernel. Then G is also acylindrically hyperbolic. However, we do not know the answer to the following.