2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11238-013-9361-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperbolic discount curves: a reply to Ainslie

Abstract: Ainslie (Theory and Decision, 73, 3-34, 2012) challenges our interpretation of the properties of hyperbolic discount curves in an iterated prisoners' dilemma (IPD) model. In this reply, we discuss the emergence of hyperbolic discount functions in the behavioral economics literature and evaluate their properties. Furthermore, we present a summarized version of our IPD model and evaluate Ainslie's points of contention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As stated by Musau (2014) , 0 , that is, is strictly monotone decreasing. Moreover, Equation (4) shows that the first derivative of the function with respect to k is negative: 0 0 0 …”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As stated by Musau (2014) , 0 , that is, is strictly monotone decreasing. Moreover, Equation (4) shows that the first derivative of the function with respect to k is negative: 0 0 0 …”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The one-parameter model by Mazur (1984) is the simplest and the most common representation of hyperbolic discounting. This model is used to explain inconsistent behavior of individuals, since it is experimentally observed that the discount rate is not constant over time, as the discounted utility model requires ( Frederick et al, 2002 , Musau, 2014 ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 2 shows that, in order to explain the improving sequence effect, it is not possible to consider a separable discount function [17]. So, our first task was to define a non-separable discount function.…”
Section: The Case Of Non-separable Discount Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, and as indicated at the beginning of this Section, this discounting model can be simplified by using a function F ( t ) independent of delay d . More specifically, a one-variable discount function F ( t ) ([ 38 ] and [ 39 ]) is a continuous real function such that defined within an interval [0, t 0 ) ( t 0 can even be +∞), where F ( t ) represents the value at 0 of a $1 reward available at instant t , satisfying the following conditions: F (0) = 1, F ( t ) > 0, and F ( t ) is strictly decreasing. …”
Section: Defining Impatience (Impulsivity) In Intertemporal Choicementioning
confidence: 99%