1996
DOI: 10.1080/10408399609527717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperactivity: Is candy causal?

Abstract: Adverse behavioral responses to ingestion of any kind of candy have been reported repeatedly in the lay press. Parents and teachers alike attribute excessive motor activity and other disruptive behaviors to candy consumption. However, anecdotal observations of this kind need to be tested scientifically before conclusions can be drawn, and criteria for interpreting diet behavior studies must be rigorous. Ingredients in nonchocolate candy (sugar, artificial food colors), components in chocolate candy (sugar, art… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The sudden increase in performance during the first day of rewarded running indicates that the mice quickly learned to associate running and reward and they performed on a high level also during the following days. Hyperactivity due to sugar intake as an explanation for a higher activity level of the rewarded runners is unlikely given that several human studies did not find correlations between a high sugar intake and hyperactivity [45,46]. Also, we observed no overt behavioural differences between the groups.…”
Section: Running For a Rewardcontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…The sudden increase in performance during the first day of rewarded running indicates that the mice quickly learned to associate running and reward and they performed on a high level also during the following days. Hyperactivity due to sugar intake as an explanation for a higher activity level of the rewarded runners is unlikely given that several human studies did not find correlations between a high sugar intake and hyperactivity [45,46]. Also, we observed no overt behavioural differences between the groups.…”
Section: Running For a Rewardcontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…More recently, it has been hypothesized that long-term excessive exposure to sugar may affect dopamine function, which, in turn, increases the likelihood of children developing attention-defi cit hyperactivity disorder [ 58 ]. Currently, however, the evidence suggests that intake of sugar does not signifi cantly impact behavior [ 59 ].…”
Section: Proposed Consequences Of Sugar Intakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related dietary strategy, simple elimination of sugar or candy, has not garnered convincing scientific support from repeated placebo-controlled acute challenge studies (Krummel, Seligson, & Guthrie, 1996;Wolraich, Wilson, & White, 1995) despite a few encouraging reports (e.g., Goldman, Lerman, Contois, & Udall, 1986). Even a well-controlled 3-week trial of a sugar-restricted diet found no effect (Wolraich, Lindgren, Stumbo, Stegink, Applebaum, & Kiritsy, 1994).…”
Section: Elimination Diets (Oligoantigenic or Few-food Diet)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Krummel et al (1996) warn that coercively enforced parental restrictions on the child's diet (or putting the rest of the family unnecessarily on the same diet) could worsen family dynamics while Lipton and Mayo (1983) say the nonspecific placebo effects are beneficial to families. There is some concern about breadth of nutrient intake on the one hand, and on the other hand the comment that eliminating junk foods improves essential nutrient intake (Rimland, 1983).…”
Section: Elimination Diets (Oligoantigenic or Few-food Diet)mentioning
confidence: 99%