1988
DOI: 10.1016/0892-0362(88)90037-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hyperactivity and instrumental learning deficits in methylazoxymethanol-treated rat offspring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This overall pattern of results may be indicative of a deficit in interval timing, and might suggest that MAM-treated animals overestimate the passage of time, as has been shown to occur in schizophrenic patients (Elvevag et al, 2003(Elvevag et al, , 2004Penney et al, 2005). The finding of a deficit in DRL performance in MAM-treated animals is somewhat at odds with previous reports, which have shown a lack of deficit on this task following embryonic day 15 MAM treatment (Archer et al, 1988). It is possible that differences in procedure may explain these discrepancies or that the deficit observed on the current task may be specific to the disruption of developmental processes occurring around embryonic day 17.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…This overall pattern of results may be indicative of a deficit in interval timing, and might suggest that MAM-treated animals overestimate the passage of time, as has been shown to occur in schizophrenic patients (Elvevag et al, 2003(Elvevag et al, , 2004Penney et al, 2005). The finding of a deficit in DRL performance in MAM-treated animals is somewhat at odds with previous reports, which have shown a lack of deficit on this task following embryonic day 15 MAM treatment (Archer et al, 1988). It is possible that differences in procedure may explain these discrepancies or that the deficit observed on the current task may be specific to the disruption of developmental processes occurring around embryonic day 17.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Since the introduc tion of the catecholamine neurotoxin, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), as an effective pharmacological tool for the study of the functional roles of DA and noradrenaline (NA) [6,7], major efforts have been aimed at the elucidation of the functions of these neu rotransmitters. Thus, 6-OHDA-induced le sions have been usefully applied to both the neonate as well as the adult animal [8], and a modicum of selectivity has been achieved through the differential use of uptake inhibi tors for either NA or DA [9], Selective de struction of brain DA neurones through intracerebroventricular administration of 6-OHDA to newborn rats pretreated with the NA uptake inhibitor desipramine invariably causes a permanent hyperactive condition, as indexed with several different methods of measuring motor activity in rats [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Other behavioral changes following neonatal 6-OHDA treatment include deficits in the performance of shock avoidance tasks [18,19], and a retarded acquisition of lever press ing responses on a fixed-ratio schedule of wa ter reinforcement in an operant conditioning chamber [20], The purpose of the experi ments outlined below is to demonstrate a recurring pattern of behavioral alteration in volving hyperactivity, performance deficits in spatial navigation learning tasks as a result of postnatal DA depletion, and particular reac tions to low doses of stimulant compounds (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, administration of these drugs to MAM-treated rats produce contradictory results. Archer et al (1988) and Watanabe et al (1990) reported that these drugs drastically increased motor activity in MAM-treated rats, while in other studies MAM-treated rats show reduced motor stimulation in response to these drugs (Sanberg et al, 1985;Balduini et al, 1986). This discrepancy may be due to methodological differences and different ages at which motor activity of MAM-treated rats was examined.…”
Section: Neurochemical Correlates Of Abnormal Motor Activity In Mam-tmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, since MAM-induced microencephalic rats exhibited hyperactivity (Kiyono et al, 1980;Hanada et al, 1982;Cannon-Spoor and Freed, 1084;Vorhees et al, 1984;Kabat et al, 1985;Plonsky et al, 1985;Nagayoshi et al, 1986;Archer et al, 1988), it is still possibile that these deficits cause hyperactivity and/or disrupted attention processes originating from hyperinnervation of catecholaminergic neurons to the forebrain regions. Other factors in the impairment of spatial learning of MAM-treated rats should be considered.…”
Section: Hmentioning
confidence: 99%