2003
DOI: 10.1126/science.1074905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hypaxial Motor Patterns and the Function of Epipubic Bones in Primitive Mammals

Abstract: Since the first description of epipubic bones in 1698, their functions and those of the associated abdominal muscles of monotremes and marsupial mammals have remained unresolved. We show that each epipubic bone is part of a kinetic linkage extending from the femur, by way of the pectineus muscle, to the epipubic bone, through the pyramidalis and rectus abdominis muscles on one side of the abdomen, and through the contralateral external and internal oblique muscles to the vertebrae and ribs of the opposite side… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As this study shows, as well as previous investigations, sagittal bending is more widespread among eutherian and also metatherian mammals (Pridmore, 1992;Schilling and Fischer, 1999) (this study). This is clearly in contrast to Reilly and White (Reilly and White, 2003), who argued that some metatherians, including the gray short-tailed opossum studied herein, do not exhibit asymmetrical gaits because of their epipubic bones which are part of a kinetic linkage. This cross-couplet kinetic connection between the hindlimb and the abdominal body wall is presumed to restrict the animals to symmetrical gaits (Reilly and White, 2003).…”
Section: The Journal Of Experimental Biologycontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As this study shows, as well as previous investigations, sagittal bending is more widespread among eutherian and also metatherian mammals (Pridmore, 1992;Schilling and Fischer, 1999) (this study). This is clearly in contrast to Reilly and White (Reilly and White, 2003), who argued that some metatherians, including the gray short-tailed opossum studied herein, do not exhibit asymmetrical gaits because of their epipubic bones which are part of a kinetic linkage. This cross-couplet kinetic connection between the hindlimb and the abdominal body wall is presumed to restrict the animals to symmetrical gaits (Reilly and White, 2003).…”
Section: The Journal Of Experimental Biologycontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…This is clearly in contrast to Reilly and White (Reilly and White, 2003), who argued that some metatherians, including the gray short-tailed opossum studied herein, do not exhibit asymmetrical gaits because of their epipubic bones which are part of a kinetic linkage. This cross-couplet kinetic connection between the hindlimb and the abdominal body wall is presumed to restrict the animals to symmetrical gaits (Reilly and White, 2003). But the use of asymmetrical gaits in the gray short-tailed opossum has been reported earlier and its locomotor parameters have been analyzed quantitatively (Pridmore, 1992;Kühnapfel, 1996;Fischer et al, 2002).…”
Section: The Journal Of Experimental Biologycontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…Many paleontologists have considered epipubic bones as evidence that mammaliaforms and early mammals (including early eutherians) carried eggs or young in a pouch or suspended from the abdomen; however, others argue that epipubic bones rather had a function in locomotion as the structure of the pelvis evolved (Novacek et al, 1997;Reilly and White, 2003). Pouches have evolved in both monotremes (e.g.…”
Section: Milk Secretion In the Context Of Synapsid Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, unlike many mammalian species in which limb bone safety factors have been measured [e.g. horses Biewener et al, 1988)], opossums are constrained to trotting, rather than transitioning to a gallop, as they run at higher speeds (Peters et al, 1984;White, 1990;Reilly and White, 2003). Yet, the question remains why high limb bone safety factors might be maintained in opossums despite the potentially lower demands that they face .…”
Section: Safety Factors In Opossum Femora: Mechanical Basis and Evolumentioning
confidence: 99%