2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2009.00230.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hygiene and Biosecurity: The Language and Politics of Risk in an Era of Emerging Infectious Diseases

Abstract: A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the repository url above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription.For more information, please contact eprints@nottingham.ac.uk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is claimed that -counter to the stated aim of the radio programme -the nature of these radio talks reinforces the image of the dis abled person as Other. Several studies by Brigitte Nerlich and her colleagues describe framing strategies in communication by both official instances and the press, about recent matters of public health and biosecurity (Nerlich et al 2002;Brown et al 2009). Closer to the topic of the present paper, Holmgreen (2008) investigates how different metaphorical construc tions in the printed Danish media reproduce and promote the viewpoints of particular societal groups on the controversial issue of biotechnology.…”
Section: Theoretical Background: Frame Semantics Framing and Simplifmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is claimed that -counter to the stated aim of the radio programme -the nature of these radio talks reinforces the image of the dis abled person as Other. Several studies by Brigitte Nerlich and her colleagues describe framing strategies in communication by both official instances and the press, about recent matters of public health and biosecurity (Nerlich et al 2002;Brown et al 2009). Closer to the topic of the present paper, Holmgreen (2008) investigates how different metaphorical construc tions in the printed Danish media reproduce and promote the viewpoints of particular societal groups on the controversial issue of biotechnology.…”
Section: Theoretical Background: Frame Semantics Framing and Simplifmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Despite the recognition of posters as an effective technology of public health by health authorities themselves (e.g., Centres for Disease Control, 1994;World Health Organization, 2009), the public health campaign poster has not received the range and diversity of scholarly attention that it merits (see also Cooter & Stein, 2010). In part, this is because when scholars have recognized the value in studying the symbolic and cultural dimensions of disease, the dominance of the paradigm of the "representations of" disease has led to a privileging of varied forms of ideological critiques and a focus on the press as the primary cultural site (see discussion in Brown et al, 2009). When scholars have turned to posters, the extant research is primarily concerned with their effects and effectiveness (or not) in achieving the desired behaviour changes they target (e.g., Boen, Maurissen, & Opdenaker, 2010;Kerr, Eves, & Carroll, 2000;Montazeri & Sajadian, 2004;Pittet, Hugonnet, Harbath, Mourouga, Sauvan, Touveneau, Perneger, & Members of the Infection Control Program, 2000).…”
Section: Hands Haptics and Hygienementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk issues clearly undergo such a process, since new crises are read in light of previousparticularly unsolved-issues. The repetition of emerging new infectious diseases certainly has triggered reflexivity, and, interestingly, the role of communication itself in the management of these diseases has started to be addressed (Brown, Nerlich, Crawford, Koteyko, & Carter, 2009;Holmes, 2008).…”
Section: Undesirable Animals: Humans At Risk?mentioning
confidence: 99%