Hydroxyapatite Versus Titanium Ossiculoplasty

Truy, Éric; Naiman, Anna Nuca; Pavillon, Clemence; Abedipour, Darius; Lina-Granade, Genevi??ve; Rabilloud, Muriel

doi:10.1097/mao.0b013e3180421c2b

Cited by 20 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Only TORP reconstructions were included in our series; therefore, our cohort differs from most other literature in which PORPs are included . Studies that combine outcomes from TORPs and PORPs may be of limited value because the presence of an intact stapes positively influences hearing outcomes and stabilizes ossicular reconstructions .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pediatric ossiculoplasty with titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pediatric ossiculoplasty with titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Three patients suffered from implant extrusion: one HA PORP and two titanium TORPs. 3 Importantly, titanium prostheses proved their biocompatibility, stability, excellent functional results, and low extrusion rate (Table I).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 95%

Are postoperative hearing results better with titanium ossicular reconstruction prostheses?

Zeitler

Lalwani

2009

The Laryngoscope

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…According to the literature, closure of the ABG to within 20 dB ranges from 60% to 85% with incus interposition [12][13][14] , from 57% to 84% with hydroxyapatite [11] , and from 60% to 81% with titanium [15][16][17][18] . Most papers comparing hearing outcomes of various ossiculoplasty materials have come to similar conclusions [19][20][21][22][23][24] . In 2014, Querat et al [25] compared the results of cartilage ossiculoplasty and partial titanium ossiculoplasty with intact stapes in canal wall-up procedures for cholesteatoma and did not find any significant difference between the two materials.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 93%

Cartilage Ossiculoplasty from Stapes to Tympanic Membrane in One-Stage Intact Canal Wall Tympanoplasty for Cholesteatoma

Denis¹,

Manac'h²,

Teszler³

et al. 2017

Int Adv Otol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Original Article INTRODUCTIONThe double cartilage block ossiculoplasty for partial ossicular reconstruction in the presence of an intact stapes was described in 1987 by Luetje and Denninghoff [1] . This technique offers several advantages-it is easy to perform, uses well-tolerated autologous materials, and has no additional cost. Despite those advantages and encouraging hearing results, this interesting ossiculoplasty technique is not very popular among otologists.For several years we have routinely used this technique at our institution, and we commonly refer to it as cartilage ossiculoplasty from stapes to tympanic membrane (COST). We decided to evaluate our results with this technique in a retrospective case-control study and to compare these to results published in studies dealing with other partial ossicular chain reconstruction techniques.To obtain a homogenous series, we selected patients having undergone a COST during a one-stage intact canal wall tympanoplasty (ICW) for cholesteatoma, even if this condition is probably one of the worst for achieving good hearing results. MATERIALS and METHODSAmong all surgical procedures performed at our institution for chronic otitis media between January 1999 and August 2006, we retrospectively selected the files of patients having undergone a COST during a primary one-stage ICW for middle ear and/or mastoid acquired cholesteatoma. We excluded ossiculoplasty procedures performed in case of chronic otitis media without cholesteatoma, canal wall-down tympanoplasties (CWD), ICW with staged ossiculoplasty, ossiculoplasties performed with other material than cartilage (incus, malleus head, hydroxyapatite, or titanium prosthesis), and cases where the stapes superstructure was missing. ICW included transcanal removal of a middle ear cholesteatoma and canal wall-up tympanoplasty.Cartilage Ossiculoplasty from Stapes to Tympanic Membrane in One-Stage Intact Canal Wall Tympanoplasty for Cholesteatoma OBJECTIVE: To report hearing results of cartilage interposition ossiculoplasty in one-stage intact canal wall (ICW) tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma with intact stapes. MATERIALS and METHODS:A retrospective study of pre and postoperative hearing status was conducted at a tertiary referral otologic center in a series of 61 patients having undergone one-stage ICW tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma with intact stapes and cartilage ossiculoplasty during the same procedure. RESULTS:In the preoperative period, the mean air conduction thresholds (AC), air-bone gap (ABG), and speech reception thresholds (SRT) were 35.3, 20.14, and 35.6 dB, respectively. Postoperatively, with a mean follow-up of 29 months, AC, ABG, and SRT were 27.8, 13.34, and 28.8 dB, respectively. Mean hearing gain was 6.8 dB and mean SRT improvement was 6.8 dB. Mean bone conduction thresholds for 1, 2, and 4 kHz remained stable after surgery (17.6 dB preoperatively vs. 18 dB postoperatively). CONCLUSION:Cartilage ossiculoplasty from stapes to tympanic membrane in one-stage ICW tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma is a safe, relia...

show abstract

Hydroxyapatite Versus Titanium Ossiculoplasty

Cited by 20 publications

References 0 publications

Pediatric ossiculoplasty with titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis

Pediatric ossiculoplasty with titanium total ossicular replacement prosthesis

Are postoperative hearing results better with titanium ossicular reconstruction prostheses?

Cartilage Ossiculoplasty from Stapes to Tympanic Membrane in One-Stage Intact Canal Wall Tympanoplasty for Cholesteatoma

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About