2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydroxyapatite Cement in Craniofacial Reconstruction

Abstract: Hydroxyapatite cements are safe in craniofacial reconstruction. The highest risk of implant infection comes from reconstruction in the area of the frontal sinus, immediately beneath coronal incisions, and in patients who receive postoperative radiation treatment. Based on our results, there does appear to be a statistically significant difference in rates of infection and foreign body reaction between the different types of hydroxyapatite cement. We would not recommend implantation of this material in contact … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
63
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
63
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, alloplastic materials, such as hydroxyapatite and carbonated apatite, have found favor in anterior table reconstruction. 16,58,59,65,66 They provide for easy on-table contouring and avoid donorsite morbidity. However, they are nonvascularized foreign materials that may predispose an already vulnerable area to reinfection.…”
Section: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • March 2009mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, alloplastic materials, such as hydroxyapatite and carbonated apatite, have found favor in anterior table reconstruction. 16,58,59,65,66 They provide for easy on-table contouring and avoid donorsite morbidity. However, they are nonvascularized foreign materials that may predispose an already vulnerable area to reinfection.…”
Section: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • March 2009mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cranioplasty is often associated with a complication rate of 10-22.5 % [22][23][24][25]. Most of their complications were in cases involving frontal sinus and patients who had undergone irradiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,4,52,56 There has been evidence of integration of new bone into the HAC at the periphery of the lesion with no foreign body reaction or inflammatory response, even in animal models. In a series of 54 patients with HAC, Arriaga and Chen 2 reported a reduction in CSF leak from 12.5% to 3.7% when compared with a similar-sized cohort in which only autologous fat was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%