1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1693(00)82250-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrotris(1-pyrazolyl)borates of chromium(III)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Elemental analysis, FTIR, and mass spectroscopy were used to characterize the isolated complexes. The solid state FTIR spectra in KBr pellets show strong absorption bands in the 1519-1523 and 294-360 cm À1 ranges, assigned to m(C-N) and m(Cr-Cl), respectively [21,22]. The spin state of the complexes was confirmed by magnetic susceptibility measurements (l eff.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Elemental analysis, FTIR, and mass spectroscopy were used to characterize the isolated complexes. The solid state FTIR spectra in KBr pellets show strong absorption bands in the 1519-1523 and 294-360 cm À1 ranges, assigned to m(C-N) and m(Cr-Cl), respectively [21,22]. The spin state of the complexes was confirmed by magnetic susceptibility measurements (l eff.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Due to Laporte's rule, the calculated oscillator strengths are very small (1.4–1.5×10 −8 each; Figure S7). The analogous absorption band of the comparable centrosymmetric bis(hydrotris(1‐pyrazolyl)borate)chromium(III) complex [Cr(HBpz 3 ) 2 ] 3+ is of similar intensity (456 nm; ϵ =35 m −1 cm −1 ), while that of [Cr(ddpd) 2 ] 3+ at 435 nm is more intense by two orders of magnitude due to the lack of the inversion center in [Cr(ddpd) 2 ] 3+ . The “octahedral” ligand field splitting Δ o =23 200 cm −1 of [Cr(tpe) 2 ] 3+ (corresponding to the center of the quartet absorption band) is in the same range as that of bpy and ddpd chromium(III) complexes, yet larger than that of [Cr(tpy) 2 ] 3+ due to the unfavorable metal‐ligand orbital overlap of the latter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following discussions,the symmetry labels of the D 3d point group are employed for [Cr(tpe) 2 ] 3+ .D ue to Laportesr ule,t he calculated oscillator strengths are very small (1.4-1.5 10 À8 each;F igure S7). The analogous absorption band of the comparable centrosymmetric bis(hydrotris(1-pyrazolyl)borate)chromium(III) complex [Cr(HBpz 3 ) 2 ] 3+ is of similar intensity (456 nm; e = 35 m À1 cm À1 ), [74] while that of [Cr(ddpd) 2 ] 3+ at 435 nm is more intense by two orders of magnitude due to the lack of the inversion center in [Cr(ddpd) 2 ] 3+ . [3] The" octahedral" ligand field splitting D o = 23 200 cm À1 of [Cr(tpe) 2 ] 3+ (corresponding to the center of the quartet absorption band) is in the same range as that of bpy and ddpd chromium(III) complexes,y et larger than that of [Cr(tpy) 2 ] 3+ due to the unfavorable metalligand orbital overlap of the latter.…”
Section: Optical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 97%