2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrothermal processing of 3D-printed calcium phosphate scaffolds enhances bone formation in vivo: a comparison with biomimetic treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The in vitro behavior showed good agreement with the in vivo results, where both the plasma‐treated composite biomaterial and its combination with direct plasma treatment displayed good bone formation, as compared to the control robocasted scaffolds that have previously shown good in vivo performance. [ 40,61 ] Here, the BVF, that is the newly formed bone in vivo, was equivalent in all samples (Figure 8a). Furthermore, histological and SEM analysis (Figures 6 and 7) showed similar results in all cases: no signs of fibrous tissue were detected and newly formed bone was in direct contact with the material for all samples, suggesting that the RONS released from the composite biomaterial did not affect nonmalignant cells (in accordance with the in vitro assay), allowing bone ingrowth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The in vitro behavior showed good agreement with the in vivo results, where both the plasma‐treated composite biomaterial and its combination with direct plasma treatment displayed good bone formation, as compared to the control robocasted scaffolds that have previously shown good in vivo performance. [ 40,61 ] Here, the BVF, that is the newly formed bone in vivo, was equivalent in all samples (Figure 8a). Furthermore, histological and SEM analysis (Figures 6 and 7) showed similar results in all cases: no signs of fibrous tissue were detected and newly formed bone was in direct contact with the material for all samples, suggesting that the RONS released from the composite biomaterial did not affect nonmalignant cells (in accordance with the in vitro assay), allowing bone ingrowth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…An in‐depth characterization of the pristine scaffolds can be found in a previous work. [ 40 ] Therefore, this section will focus on the characterization of the novel composite biomaterial composed of the CDHA scaffold infiltrated with plasma‐treated Gel/Alg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3D-printing technologies have enabled the production of scaffolds with greater spatial resolution than traditional fabrication methods, providing complex porous hierarchical structures 72 75 . Moreover, the development of biomimetic self-setting ceramic inks has circumvented the problems associated with shrinkage in ceramic parts and has allowed nanostructured calcium phosphate scaffolds to be obtained 76 .…”
Section: Scaffolds For Bone Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raymond et al . [ 249 ] reported that α-TCP scaffolds by direct ink writing presented more crystallization nanostructures, and had a major impact on permeability and protein adsorption capacity after hydrothermal processes when compared with biomimetic treatment.…”
Section: Functional Engineering Strategies Of Ceramic Materials For H...mentioning
confidence: 99%