The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Hydrothermal Processes and Mineral Systems 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8613-7_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrothermal Processes Associated with Meteorite Impacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The average concentrations of Mn in Near and Far areas were 544.63 and 643.84 mg kg −1 , respectively. The increased concentration of Mn in the Far area may result from the fact that during ore genesis (IOCG mineralization type), Mn, which has normally a high solubility, is transported laterally by hydrothermal fluids and then precipitated further up in the intrusion, or distal to it (Barnes 1997; Pirajno 2009). The Mann-Whitney test showed that there were significant differences between Mn and Pb concentrations in Near and Far areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average concentrations of Mn in Near and Far areas were 544.63 and 643.84 mg kg −1 , respectively. The increased concentration of Mn in the Far area may result from the fact that during ore genesis (IOCG mineralization type), Mn, which has normally a high solubility, is transported laterally by hydrothermal fluids and then precipitated further up in the intrusion, or distal to it (Barnes 1997; Pirajno 2009). The Mann-Whitney test showed that there were significant differences between Mn and Pb concentrations in Near and Far areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impact‐generated hydrothermal activity has been reported from a number of terrestrial impact craters (Newsom ; Naumov ; Pirajno ; Osinski et al. ; and references therein), from large impact structures 200–250 km in diameter, such as the Sudbury structure (e.g., Ames et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, ), to smaller craters of only 1.8 km in diameter (e.g., Lonar crater; Newsom and Hagerty ). The thermal energy driving these hydrothermal systems is derived from (1) the remnant heat of impact melts or melt‐bearing rocks and (2) the hot sections of the central uplift with rocks from initially greater depths (Pirajno ). So far, no evidence has been provided that impact‐generated magmatism could create hydrothermal fluid convection on (the post‐Hadean) Earth independent from impact melts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aside from that, similar to central uplifts, ring structures are potential sites where surface deposits and near-surface alteration of shattered target rocks by impact-induced hydrothermal fluid convection can be studied (Osinski et al 2001Pirajno 2009). Clear evidence of postimpact hydrothermal activity in impact structures first came from the investigation of Ries suevite deposits (Newsom et al 1986;Osinski 2005;Muttik et al 2011;Sapers et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%