“…), the development and inclusion of advanced active materials possessing higher energy densities than present state-of-the-art active materials are believed to be the only option to achieve the aforementioned values for energy density and costs for future LIBs. − Apart from carbon/graphite as a standard negative electrode (N) material, mainly alloying-type negative electrode materials and in particular silicon (Si) are considered to be the most promising candidates to further increase the energy density of N. ,− Although already small amounts of silicon (very often as SiO x ) are added to the carbon-based N within some commercial LIBs, ,, the incorporation of higher amounts of Si, which would enable a strong boost in terms of energy density, is still hampered by the insufficient cycle life of such cells. This issue is essentially related to huge volume variations of Si upon (de-)lithiation, going along with structural instabilities of N. ,, Mainly, the breakdown and in consequence the continuous (re-)formation , of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) , at the alloy surface consume significant amounts of active lithium (Li) and electrolyte, consequently resulting in a poor cycling performance of LIBs incorporating Si-based N. − Various approaches to address those issues are reported in the literature, including nanostructuring of the Si, − using intermetallic , or carbon-based composite materials, , the application of artificial protection layers, , or prelithiation techniques − for compensating active Li losses.…”