Abstract:The addition of Sb-H bonds to alkynes was reported recently as a new hydroelementation reaction that exclusively yields anti-Markovnikov Z-olefins from terminal acetylenes. We examine four possible mechanisms that are consistent with the observed stereochemical and regiochemical outcomes. A comprehensive analysis of solvent, substituent, isotope, additive, and temperature effects on hydrostibination reaction rates definitively refutes three ionic mechanisms involving closed-shell charged intermediates. Instead… Show more
“…25 The mechanism for hydrobismuthation was examined with DFT. Similarly to the results of Chitnis and co-workers for hydrostibination, 26 all closed-shell pathways leading to 2 were found to have significant energy barriers and are, therefore, unfeasible under the experimental conditions. Consequently, a radical mechanism was sought, which led to the characterization of transition states TS-1 for hydrogen transfer from 1 to phenylacetylene (Figure 4).…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…In contrast the mechanism for hydrostibination follows a pathway in which the stibinyl and 1-phenylvinyl radicals separate, allowing the former to add to an equivalent of phenylacetylene and undergo a second hydrogen transfer to give the anti-Markovnikov product. 26 In this context, the dissociation of INT-1 to bismuthinyl and 1-phenylvinyl radicals was calculated to be an entropy-driven process, while the transition state associated with the addition of the bismuthinyl radical to phenylacetylene was found to be energetically on par with TS-1. Thus, the recombination of bismuthinyl and 1-phenylvinyl radicals, as shown in Figure 4, represents the minimum energy pathway and agrees with the observed Markovnikov regioselectivity.…”
The bismuth hydride (2,6-Mes 2 H 3 C 6 ) 2 BiH (1, Mes = 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl), which has a Bi−H 1 H NMR spectroscopic signal at δ = 19.64 ppm, was reacted with phenylacetylene at 60 °C in toluene to yield [(2,6-Mes 2 C 6 H 3 ) 2 BiC(Ph) =CH 2 ] (2) after 15 min. Compound 2 was characterized by 1 H, 13 C NMR, and UV−vis spectroscopy, single crystal X-ray crystallography, and calculations employing density functional theory. Compound 2 is the first example of a hydrobismuthation addition product and displays Markovnikov regioselectivity. Computational methods indicated that it forms via a radical mechanism with an associated Gibbs energy of activation of 91 kJ mol −1 and a reaction energy of −90 kJ mol −1 .
“…25 The mechanism for hydrobismuthation was examined with DFT. Similarly to the results of Chitnis and co-workers for hydrostibination, 26 all closed-shell pathways leading to 2 were found to have significant energy barriers and are, therefore, unfeasible under the experimental conditions. Consequently, a radical mechanism was sought, which led to the characterization of transition states TS-1 for hydrogen transfer from 1 to phenylacetylene (Figure 4).…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…In contrast the mechanism for hydrostibination follows a pathway in which the stibinyl and 1-phenylvinyl radicals separate, allowing the former to add to an equivalent of phenylacetylene and undergo a second hydrogen transfer to give the anti-Markovnikov product. 26 In this context, the dissociation of INT-1 to bismuthinyl and 1-phenylvinyl radicals was calculated to be an entropy-driven process, while the transition state associated with the addition of the bismuthinyl radical to phenylacetylene was found to be energetically on par with TS-1. Thus, the recombination of bismuthinyl and 1-phenylvinyl radicals, as shown in Figure 4, represents the minimum energy pathway and agrees with the observed Markovnikov regioselectivity.…”
The bismuth hydride (2,6-Mes 2 H 3 C 6 ) 2 BiH (1, Mes = 2,4,6-trimethylphenyl), which has a Bi−H 1 H NMR spectroscopic signal at δ = 19.64 ppm, was reacted with phenylacetylene at 60 °C in toluene to yield [(2,6-Mes 2 C 6 H 3 ) 2 BiC(Ph) =CH 2 ] (2) after 15 min. Compound 2 was characterized by 1 H, 13 C NMR, and UV−vis spectroscopy, single crystal X-ray crystallography, and calculations employing density functional theory. Compound 2 is the first example of a hydrobismuthation addition product and displays Markovnikov regioselectivity. Computational methods indicated that it forms via a radical mechanism with an associated Gibbs energy of activation of 91 kJ mol −1 and a reaction energy of −90 kJ mol −1 .
“…They later comprehensively studied the mechanism of this hydrostibination and suggested that a radical mechanism is at play. 144 Finally, in the context of HP, it is important to note that all of the heavier-congener hydropnictogenations reported display near-perfect anti-Markovnikov selectivity.…”
“…More recently, Chitnis and co-workers reported a catalyst- and initiator-free hydrostibination by tuning the stibene backbone to stabilize the LUMO of the stibene (Scheme b). They later comprehensively studied the mechanism of this hydrostibination and suggested that a radical mechanism is at play . Finally, in the context of HP, it is important to note that all of the heavier-congener hydropnictogenations reported display near-perfect anti-Markovnikov selectivity.…”
In this Perspective, we discuss what we perceive to be
the continued
challenges faced in catalytic hydrophosphination chemistry. Currently
the literature is dominated by catalysts, many of which are highly
effective, that generate the same phosphorus architectures, e.g.,
anti-Markovnikov products from the reaction of activated alkenes and
alkynes with diarylphosphines. We highlight the state of the art in
stereoselective hydrophosphination and the scope and limitations of
chemoselective hydrophosphination with primary phosphines and PH
3
. We also highlight the progress in the chemistry of the heavier
homologues. In general, we have tried to emphasize what is missing
from our hydrophosphination armament, with the aim of guiding future
research targets.
“…We recently noted that these ligands also have the appropriate steric profile to stabilize very fragile bonds and demonstrated this application by successfully isolating reactive antimony hydrides as well as the first examples of Sb–Bi σ-bonds (Figure d,e). − In the latter case, our preliminary calculations suggested that the metal–metal bond energies for some derivatives were boosted by a remarkable 60% due to London dispersion. As a consequence, Sb–Bi σ-bonds that rapidly decompose at 298 K when supported by small methyl groups were stable for several days at 373 K when the 1,8-bis(silylamido) naphthalene ligand was used.…”
There is emerging consensus that stabilization of weak bonds using bulky substituents operates not only by steric shielding but also by boosting the dispersive attraction across the bond. While many studies have explored this concept for hydrocarbon, arene, carbene, and phosphine ligands, it remains minimally explored for amide ligands. Bulky 1,8-bis(silylamido) naphthalenes were recently used to isolate the first example of Sb−Bi σ-bonds, which was tentatively ascribed to an unexpectedly high degree of interfragment dispersive stabilization. To understand this finding and study how the interplay between steric repulsion and dispersive attraction alters metal−metal bond strengths more generally, we have computationally examined Sb−Sb, Sb−Bi, and Bi−Bi σ-bond enthalpies and energies in 21 compounds within the 1,8-bis(silylamido) naphthalenes ligand framework. The energies have been dissected into base electronic, London dispersion, and ligand deformation contributions. The London dispersion component has been further deconvoluted to identify the most significant pairwise functional group interactions driving stabilization from noncovalent interactions. Steric clashes have been considered by examining the extent of ligand deformation. The resulting insights will enable the rational evolution of these accessible and tunable ligands in the context of stabilizing weak bonds and may also be transferable to other amide ligands.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.