2016
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201603592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrostatic Pressure Studies Distinguish Global from Local Protein Motions in C−H Activation by Soybean Lipoxygenase‐1

Abstract: The proposed contributions of distinct classes of local versus global protein motions during enzymatic bond making/breaking processes has been difficult to verify.W e employed soybean lipoxygenase-1 as am odel system to investigate the impact of high pressure at variable temperatures on the hydrogen-tunneling properties of the wild-type protein and three single-site mutants.F or all variants,p ressure dramatically elevates the enthalpies of activation for the C À H activation. In contrast, the primary kinetic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A related temperature−pressure perturbation study of DM SLO also highlights the distinctive features of this variant. 28,32 Unlike the pressure-induced shifted conformational landscape in WT and three single mutants (L546A, L754A and I553V), the conformational landscape of the enzyme−substrate complex of DM is more resistant to perturbations from elevated pressure, showing a consistently high energy barrier (E a = 8−9.9 kcal/mol) and slow catalytic efficiency (10 4 -fold decrease) relative to WT. At this juncture, a major unanswered question is the structural origin underlying the aggregated features of DM SLO.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A related temperature−pressure perturbation study of DM SLO also highlights the distinctive features of this variant. 28,32 Unlike the pressure-induced shifted conformational landscape in WT and three single mutants (L546A, L754A and I553V), the conformational landscape of the enzyme−substrate complex of DM is more resistant to perturbations from elevated pressure, showing a consistently high energy barrier (E a = 8−9.9 kcal/mol) and slow catalytic efficiency (10 4 -fold decrease) relative to WT. At this juncture, a major unanswered question is the structural origin underlying the aggregated features of DM SLO.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between experimental KIEs during the biomolecular reaction of enzyme with substrate (k cat /K m ) and the unimolecular turnover rate (k cat ) led to the proposal of perturbed conformational landscapes in selected mutants. 31 The further application of various biophysical approaches that include studies of increased hydrostatic pressure, 32 hydrogen−deuterium ex-change mass spectrometry (HDXMS), 33 and 13 C ENDOR spectroscopy, 34 has both enhanced our understanding of the structural origin of perturbed conformational landscapes and expanded the "deep-tunneling" model to include both local DAD sampling and more global conformational sampling coordinates. 9,35 For the majority of enzymes that have been studied (e.g., refs 32, 36−40), perturbations produce an elevated energy of activation for C−H cleavage that can be ascribed to an altered global conformational landscape with an increase in inactive (or poorly active) enzyme−substrate (E-S) substates.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerically fitting these data then gives Δ H ‡ , Δ S ‡ , Δ G ‡ , ΔCP, Δ V ‡ , Δβ ‡ and Δα ‡ reflecting the changes in enthalpy, entropy, Gibbs free energy, heat capacity, activation volume, compressibility and expansivity between the enzyme–substrate complex and the enzyme–transition state complex respectively. The enzyme kinetics for only a relatively few enzymes has been treated by combined p / T studies . In these cases, the p /T plane has not been fitted with a numerical model meaning at least ΔCP and ∆α ‡ are not determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such dynamical interconversions are often rapid (picoseconds to microseconds) (14), and, due to their short lifetimes, exceedingly difficult to measure experimentally and to link to active site catalysis. Experimental tools to address these processes include the combined application of site-specific mutagenesis with biophysical measurements of fluorescence lifetimes and Stokes shifts (15), elevation of pressure (16), T-jump FRET (17), and rapid, time-dependent X-ray crystallography (18). Alternatively, hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) can be used for the spatial resolution of protein motions (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%