2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2009.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrostatic pressure and conduction band non-parabolicity effects on the impurity binding energy in a spherical quantum dot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy can be explained as follows: (1) the electron is spatially more confined than the size decrease of the QDs suggests, which results in increasing the binding energy of the exciton and band gap energy. However, previous research reported that any further decrease in the size of the QDs leads to the reduction of the exciton binding energy and leakage of electrons out of the QDs. In the case of Sn 12 , the band gap energy is assumed to be lower than that of the theoretical model because the leakage of the electron significantly occurs around this size. (2) The periodic potential of the tin oxide crystal disappears with the decreasing size, and it is assumed that the Sn 12 oxide QDs might contain no crystal moiety as described by the DFT calculations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discrepancy can be explained as follows: (1) the electron is spatially more confined than the size decrease of the QDs suggests, which results in increasing the binding energy of the exciton and band gap energy. However, previous research reported that any further decrease in the size of the QDs leads to the reduction of the exciton binding energy and leakage of electrons out of the QDs. In the case of Sn 12 , the band gap energy is assumed to be lower than that of the theoretical model because the leakage of the electron significantly occurs around this size. (2) The periodic potential of the tin oxide crystal disappears with the decreasing size, and it is assumed that the Sn 12 oxide QDs might contain no crystal moiety as described by the DFT calculations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these, quasi-zerodimensional systems (QD) became a hot topic, since the carrier motion is restricted to a narrow region of a few nanometers in dimension and its effects of hydrostatic pressure on QD were studied by many researchers. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Peter calculated the ionization energies in external perturbations such as hydrostatic pressure and magnetic field with a parabolic confinement for finite barrier quantum dots. [10] He found that the ionization energy is purely pressure dependent and for smaller dot sizes the hydrostatic pressure dominates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15] The effects of electric field, hydrostatic pressure, and temperature on the binding energy in SQD have been reported by Rezaei et al [16] Prodigious copies are available for the effects of hydrostatic pressure, temperature, and conduction band nonparabolicity on the impurity binding energy in an SQD. [17,18] Though the effects of hydrostatic pressure, temperature, and polaronic mass on the correlation energies in an SQD [19] have been widely investigated, very few reports explore the effect of polaron mass on donor binding and confined energies. Hence, the present work focuses on analyzing the hydrostatic pressure and polaronic effects in the SQD of the donor binding and confined energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies of the single-layered QD with a central donor impurity for different confining potential values, have been reported in [12,13,14,15,16]. Varshni in [17] calculated the energies for 1s, 2p and 3d states of a QD by using of the variational method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%