2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophobicity of peat soils: Characterization of organic compound changes associated with heat-induced water repellency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
1
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Another recent study also found that relatively low-temperature fire caused the rapid formation of hydrophobic coatings on the surface of peat soils with minimal structural changes to bulk SOC (Wu, Zhang, Slater, Waddington, & de Lannoy, 2020). Our XPS results also point to the increased abundance of aromatic compounds on the surface of aggregates, a pattern similar to charcoal and biochar, which has been shown to produce positive or negative priming of microbial respiration depending on feedstock and temperature of production.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another recent study also found that relatively low-temperature fire caused the rapid formation of hydrophobic coatings on the surface of peat soils with minimal structural changes to bulk SOC (Wu, Zhang, Slater, Waddington, & de Lannoy, 2020). Our XPS results also point to the increased abundance of aromatic compounds on the surface of aggregates, a pattern similar to charcoal and biochar, which has been shown to produce positive or negative priming of microbial respiration depending on feedstock and temperature of production.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Such hydrophobic coatings are commonly created during low‐severity fires (DeBano et al, 1970) and have low water solubility (Gonzalez‐Perez et al, 2004; Knicker, 2007), giving these coatings the potential for long‐term persistence in soil affected by fires. Another recent study also found that relatively low‐temperature fire caused the rapid formation of hydrophobic coatings on the surface of peat soils with minimal structural changes to bulk SOC (Wu, Zhang, Slater, Waddington, & de Lannoy, 2020). Our XPS results also point to the increased abundance of aromatic compounds on the surface of aggregates, a pattern similar to charcoal and biochar, which has been shown to produce positive or negative priming of microbial respiration depending on feedstock and temperature of production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Hydrophobicity is either a nature or ability of soil (peat soil) to hold water in low power or a soil surface state that can no longer bind water (Szajdak dan Szatylowicz, 2010). Hydrophobicity is caused by a decrease in total acidity, carboxyl groups, and hydroxyphenolate content (Utami et al, 2009b;Wu et al, 2020). Masganti (2012) added that in the laboratory, hydrophobic peat soil would produce a biased value in the analysis of chemical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…300°C was selected because this was within reasonable range of temperatures that peat fires occur ( i.e. , 250–300 °C) [10] . Moreover, we picked corn starch (Sigma-Aldrich) and cellulose (Sigma-Aldrich) as precursors, due to their low cost and abundance in North America, as well as their potential to partly mimic peat constituents, i.e.…”
Section: Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These peats are also a large reservoir for terrestrial carbon. Boreal peats suffer from frequent peat fires and droughts, which are becoming more frequent due to climate change [ 10 ]. Damaged surface peats contribute to water runoff, have been shown to impact the water quality of downstream communities, and can impede the regrowth of valuable boreal forests after forest fires.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%