2012
DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/9/6/065001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophobicity of methylated DNA as a possible mechanism for gene silencing

Abstract: AFM images show that chromatin reconstituted on methylated DNA (meDNA) is compacted when imaged under water. Chromatin reconstituted on unmethylated DNA is less compacted and less sensitive to hydration. These differences must reflect changes in the physical properties of DNA on methylation, but prior studies have not revealed large differences between methylated and unmethylated DNA. Quasi-elastic light scattering (QELS) studies of solutions of methylated and unmethylated DNA support this view. In contrast, A… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(69 reference statements)
10
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the findings of this paper can be a major stepping stone towards understanding the effects of DNA methylation on chromosome compactness, other factors, such as interactions between nucleosomes, effective lengths of linker DNA and interactions with linker histone proteins, have to be accounted for to correlate the observed changes in mono-nucleosome conformation with chromosome compactness. This additional information will be essential to reconcile the controversial evidences as to the effects of DNA methylation on chromosome compactness in literature383940.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the findings of this paper can be a major stepping stone towards understanding the effects of DNA methylation on chromosome compactness, other factors, such as interactions between nucleosomes, effective lengths of linker DNA and interactions with linker histone proteins, have to be accounted for to correlate the observed changes in mono-nucleosome conformation with chromosome compactness. This additional information will be essential to reconcile the controversial evidences as to the effects of DNA methylation on chromosome compactness in literature383940.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along the same lines, Choy et al (2010) suggest that the enhanced rigidity of methylated DNA leads to more compact and closed nucleosomes. Methylated DNA was also shown to be more difficult to remove from a nucleosome (Kaur et al, 2012). By combining data from genome-wide nucleosome positioning with available DNA methylation maps, Chodavarapu et al (2010) have shown that there is a small increase (about 1.2%, from 75 to 76.2%) in preference of nucleosome positioning for methylated DNA.…”
Section: Relationship Between Nucleosome Positioning and Dna Methylationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methylation of cytosine is an epigenetic modification essential for the regulation of many biological processes, and DNA methylation affects nucleosome shape and dynamics. Single molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), solid‐state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies have indicated that the nucleosome rigidifies upon DNA methylation. An increase in the stiffness of bare DNA upon methylation was seen in DNA circularization experiments,4b, gel studies, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) experiments, and methylation was shown to alter the curvature of DNA in electrophoresis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%