2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2013.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophobicity and geometry: Water at curved graphitic-like surfaces and within model pores in self-assembled monolayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, by means of the study of water density fluctuations, we shall estimate the local hydrophobicity properties both for model surfaces and for the different groups of the lipid bilayer. These studies might be relevant for the comprehension of the behavior of binding sites in different contexts which, as already indicated, are expected to present easily removable hydration water which might be replaced by the ligand upon binding (Fernández and Scheraga 2003;Fernández and Scott 2003;Fernández 2010;Qvist et al 2008;Berne et al 2009;Young et al 2007;Wang et al 2011;Kulp III et al 2011;Accordino et al 2012aAccordino et al , b, c, 2013Sierra et al 2013;Alarcón et al 2014;Bogan and Thorn 1998;Li and Liu 2009). We thus conclude with a few words of further emphasis on the relevance of this kind of knowledge to biology and to the design of new materials by highlighting the context-dependent and non-additive nature of different con-covalent interactions in an aqueous nanoenvironment, an issue that is usually greatly overlooked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, by means of the study of water density fluctuations, we shall estimate the local hydrophobicity properties both for model surfaces and for the different groups of the lipid bilayer. These studies might be relevant for the comprehension of the behavior of binding sites in different contexts which, as already indicated, are expected to present easily removable hydration water which might be replaced by the ligand upon binding (Fernández and Scheraga 2003;Fernández and Scott 2003;Fernández 2010;Qvist et al 2008;Berne et al 2009;Young et al 2007;Wang et al 2011;Kulp III et al 2011;Accordino et al 2012aAccordino et al , b, c, 2013Sierra et al 2013;Alarcón et al 2014;Bogan and Thorn 1998;Li and Liu 2009). We thus conclude with a few words of further emphasis on the relevance of this kind of knowledge to biology and to the design of new materials by highlighting the context-dependent and non-additive nature of different con-covalent interactions in an aqueous nanoenvironment, an issue that is usually greatly overlooked.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Larger holes (up to roughly L D 25 Å), where the water molecules can enter retaining their coordination, are nonetheless more hydrophobic than the perfect monolayer, which means that hydrophobicity is clearly curvature-dependent for concave surfaces. Such result of a geometrically-induced dehydration is interesting, for example, for the context of protein binding, since protein binding pockets are expected to be dry or to contain easily removable water which should be displaced by a ligand upon association (Fernández and Scheraga 2003;Fernández and Scott 2003;Fernández 2010;Qvist et al 2008;Berne et al 2009;Young et al 2007;Wang et al 2011;Kulp III et al 2011;Accordino et al 2012aAccordino et al , b, c, 2013Sierra et al 2013;Alarcón et al 2014;Bogan and Thorn 1998;Li and Liu 2009). …”
Section: Water At Self-assembled Monolayers Filling Of Cavities and mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations