2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2jm33955b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophobic Teflon films as concentrators for single-molecule SERS detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further dilution of analyte concentrations to eventually 0.1 fmol gives a relatively constant SERS intensity of ∼10 counts, which we attribute to the submonolayer Langmuir adsorption of Sudan I on our SERS platform (SI, Figure S10). 19,35 Thus, the detection limit of Sudan I is determined as 0.1 fmol (SI, Figure S11), and we again exclude any potential background interferences from our SHP-OP SERS platform (control in SI, Figure S11A). Consequently, an analytical enhancement factor of (1.87 × 10 8 ) is determined (SI, Figure S11), which is ∼10 3 -fold less compared to the analytical enhancement factor calculated using water-soluble melamine due to the difference in analyte concentration factor for both liquids, and also the Raman cross sections of the respective analytes.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further dilution of analyte concentrations to eventually 0.1 fmol gives a relatively constant SERS intensity of ∼10 counts, which we attribute to the submonolayer Langmuir adsorption of Sudan I on our SERS platform (SI, Figure S10). 19,35 Thus, the detection limit of Sudan I is determined as 0.1 fmol (SI, Figure S11), and we again exclude any potential background interferences from our SHP-OP SERS platform (control in SI, Figure S11A). Consequently, an analytical enhancement factor of (1.87 × 10 8 ) is determined (SI, Figure S11), which is ∼10 3 -fold less compared to the analytical enhancement factor calculated using water-soluble melamine due to the difference in analyte concentration factor for both liquids, and also the Raman cross sections of the respective analytes.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Xie et al described a method that allows reproducibly obtaining self‐assembled monolayers of Au nanorods by controlling humidity and temperature of the drying environment . Furthermore, it has been determined that wettability and temperature of the substrate on which the colloid drop is casted has great influence on how the NPs settle . All of these factors should be considered when preparing SERS substrates by drying the metal NPs colloids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. 3d, 18 In comparison, the spectral curves achieved from the hydrophilic substrates showed significant deviation (Fig. The strongest peaks at wavenumbers of 1509 cm −1 , 1359 cm −1 and 611 cm −1 in Raman spectroscopy were selected to characterize the quantity of R6G molecules.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%