2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophobic interaction chromatography of proteins IV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under such conditions, it is expected that adsorption/desorption and folding/unfolding rates will be slow relative to the experiments in this work, requiring kinetic modeling that explicitly accounts for the loss of unlabeled protein from the resin by both the desorption and unfolding pathways. The presence of unlabeled, adsorbed protein after an initial equilibration period that was much longer than k À1 unf ;surf also confirms that unfolding on the surface can be reversible, in contrast to recent work that models surface unfolding as an irreversible process (Haimer et al, 2007). An irreversible unfolding process is inconsistent with the data in this study, in which most of the adsorbed protein is observed to be in the native conformation after a 30-min equilibration period, but undergoes unfolding at a sufficiently high rate that essentially all of the protein is fully labeled within 1 min.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Under such conditions, it is expected that adsorption/desorption and folding/unfolding rates will be slow relative to the experiments in this work, requiring kinetic modeling that explicitly accounts for the loss of unlabeled protein from the resin by both the desorption and unfolding pathways. The presence of unlabeled, adsorbed protein after an initial equilibration period that was much longer than k À1 unf ;surf also confirms that unfolding on the surface can be reversible, in contrast to recent work that models surface unfolding as an irreversible process (Haimer et al, 2007). An irreversible unfolding process is inconsistent with the data in this study, in which most of the adsorbed protein is observed to be in the native conformation after a 30-min equilibration period, but undergoes unfolding at a sufficiently high rate that essentially all of the protein is fully labeled within 1 min.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In the model formulation, the protein could undergo an irreversible unfolding process or ''spreading'' following the initial adsorption to the surface from the liquid phase. Jungbauer et al [36] and Haimer et al [37] evaluated the kinetics of the conformational change of various model proteins using different HIC stationary phases. In the studies, the authors showed the rate of the conformational change depended on a variety of parameters, including the protein type, adsorbent ligand type, and solution salt concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have applied the spreading model to predict the adsorption properties of membrane adsorbers [38] and HIC adsorbents [37]. Haimer et al coupled the spreading model with the continuity equation to describe the mass transport process within a HIC column.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIC shows similar capacity to ion exchange chromatography (IEC) and a high level of resolution. Since it exploits a different principle than IEC and other separation techniques it can be used as an orthogonal method to achieve the purification of complex protein mixtures (Haimer et al, 2007). In this chapter, the theoretical principles underlying macromolecule retention in HIC are reviewed and discussed in sight of their application for predicting macromolecule behavior in HIC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%