2007
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0605859104
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophobic association of α-helices, steric dewetting, and enthalpic barriers to protein folding

Abstract: Efficient protein folding implies a microscopic funnel-like multidimensional free-energy landscape. Macroscopically, conformational entropy reduction can manifest itself as part of an empirical barrier in the traditional view of folding, but experiments show that such barriers can also entail significant unfavorable enthalpy changes. This observation raises the puzzling possibility, irrespective of conformational entropy, that individual microscopic folding trajectories may encounter large uphill moves and thu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
107
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
14
107
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For these reasons, the pairwise hydrophobic interactions in our model should provide predictive information about the kinetic process leading up to the folding transition state, i.e., before tight packing becomes overwhelmingly important. For the same reasons, however, our model may be less adequate for unfolding kinetics and overall folding cooperativity (which are not the focus of this study) because the present approach does not consider many-body interactions that are likely important for modeling tight packing and highly cooperative behaviors (44)(45)(46)(47)(48). The simulations and experimental work presented here have therefore focused only on folding rates and not unfolding rates or overall thermodynamic stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, the pairwise hydrophobic interactions in our model should provide predictive information about the kinetic process leading up to the folding transition state, i.e., before tight packing becomes overwhelmingly important. For the same reasons, however, our model may be less adequate for unfolding kinetics and overall folding cooperativity (which are not the focus of this study) because the present approach does not consider many-body interactions that are likely important for modeling tight packing and highly cooperative behaviors (44)(45)(46)(47)(48). The simulations and experimental work presented here have therefore focused only on folding rates and not unfolding rates or overall thermodynamic stability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S6). In principle, D could change with temperature due to changes in water viscosity and steric hindrance during peptide bond rotations [together Ϸ24 kJ/mol (35)], steric dewetting (36), and the roughness in the energy landscape that is smoothed out by the free energy projection. The latter could also make D decrease along the reaction coordinate (2) and produce superArrhenius temperature dependence (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1b provides an assessment of this additivity assumption. Here, the PMF between two 20-residue α-helices simulated using an explicit-water model 78 is contrasted with an effective potential constructed for the same manybody system based on assuming pairwise additivitiy of our db potential. Figure 1b shows that the overall barrier to helix-helix association (at separation ∼ 1 nm) computed from explicit-water simulation (dashed curve) is lower than that calculated by a simple summation of contributions from our implicit-water potential for individual residue pairs (continuous curve).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%