2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography in analysis of granisetron HCl and its related substances. Retention mechanisms and method development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the end, spline interpolation was once again tested to prove its applicability. It was implemented on the results of our previous study . In that study, granisetron and its 2 impurities were investigated in HILIC, and their retention mechanisms were assessed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end, spline interpolation was once again tested to prove its applicability. It was implemented on the results of our previous study . In that study, granisetron and its 2 impurities were investigated in HILIC, and their retention mechanisms were assessed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, papers have focused on the optimization of a complete method, looking at different parameters such as buffers, salts, their concentrations, pH, the organic‐modifier content, temperature, and stationary phase. When optimizing the modifier content, a number of studies used the LSS model [131–135], the ADS model [100,131–136], the Q model [100,136], and the MM model [131,133]. Often, more than one model is used to distinguish for example between the partitioning mechanism and the adsorption mechanism [110,111].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, retention behavior of granisetron and its two related substances with similar structure (Fig. ) on ZIC HILIC column was assessed, whereby kept the other parameters constant but changed the acetonitrile content (80–97%) . By fitting of the retention data to the above mentioned two theoretical models, it was found that although coefficients of determination ( R 2 ), which was used as measures of goodness of fit, were considerably high (0.9966–0.9989 and 0.9966–0.9987) in both models, the ranges of the values of standard errors regarding partition model and adsorption model were close (0.085–0.141 and 0.010–0.338), and in that case it would be not possible to determine which of the processes contribute to the overall HILIC retention mechanism most.…”
Section: Retention Mechanism and Retention Behavior In Hilicmentioning
confidence: 99%