2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydronephrosis: Comparison of extrinsic vessel versus intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction groups and a plea against the vascular hitch procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
30
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In a typical course of UPJO with the presence of CV in the history, recurring pain in the lumbar and abdominal region frequently occurs. 7 In the analyzed material, the symptoms of renal colic, nausea and vomiting were the dominant symptoms in patients with CV. As many as 68% of our patients presented with CV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a typical course of UPJO with the presence of CV in the history, recurring pain in the lumbar and abdominal region frequently occurs. 7 In the analyzed material, the symptoms of renal colic, nausea and vomiting were the dominant symptoms in patients with CV. As many as 68% of our patients presented with CV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The most common extrinsic factor of UPJO is the presence of CV. 1,4,5,7 In the literature, they are described as an artery or an artery and a vein supplying the lower pole of the kidney. Localized at the height of the UPJ, they can cause mechanical obstruction and the occurrence of a symptomatic hydronephrosis (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, even for the failed pyeloplasty, minimally invasive revision is safe and potentially more efficacious than open repair.57 The simple surgical displacement of a crossing vessel, which avoids a sutured anastomosis, is an attractive laparoscopic option that has been successful in some cases58 but carries the risk of leaving intrinsic obstruction unrelieved. 59 In affluent communities, robotic assistance is more common than laparoscopy alone, perhaps because of ease of suturing. The standard transperitoneal robotic approach leaves a well hidden umbilical scar, an ipsilateral lower quadrant scar, and a epigastric scar that can be cosmetically troublesome.…”
Section: Pelvi-ureteric Junction Obstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%