“…It was previously postulated, 13 from a consideration of the aromatic-solvent-induced chemical shift (ASIS) change of +0.58 ppm in the proton chemical shifts between CD 2 Cl 2 and C 6 D 6 solutions of anti-B 18 H 22 , that the µH(8,9) bridging proton might undergo a weak interaction with the aromatic solvent similar to that seen in nido-B 10 H 14 , 17 and this has been subsequently confirmed in the crystal structures of the benzene solvates of anti-B 18 H 22 , 18 4,4'-(SH) 2 -anti-B 18 H 20 , 3 and 4,4'-I 2 -anti-B 18 H 20 . 5 This +0.58 ppm change in 1 compares to the effective +1.21 ppm difference in the chemical shift of µH (9,10) in 12 (0.83 + 0.38 = 1.21 ppm). This may be a consequence both of the considerably closer approach of the internally structurally constrained Cl and H positions for µH(9,10), 2.33 Å, and of the electronegativity of chlorine, compared to that for µH(8,9) and the benzene ring centroid in anti-B 18 H 22 .C 6 H 6 of 2.816 Å.…”