2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.wroa.2022.100151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrolysis capacity of different sized granules in a full-scale aerobic granular sludge (AGS) reactor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, for all conditions, preferential selection for PAOs and GAOs will result from a duly operated anaerobic selector by managing the contact time between the influent wastewater and the biomass to enable hydrolysis, fermentation, and VFA uptake by these organisms prior to switching aeration or anoxic phases on. In granular sludge systems, this can occur via well-designed bed geometries and hydraulic conditions under slow up-flow feeding conditions, and/or by the integration of a subsequent anaerobic batch phase to promote the hydrolysis, fermentation, and uptake of VFAs by PAOs or GAOs (de Kreuk and van Loosdrecht, 2004; Weissbrodt et al, 2013b; Lochmatter and Holliger, 2014; Pronk et al, 2015b; Wagner et al, 2015; Derlon et al, 2016; Weissbrodt et al, 2017; Winkler et al, 2018; Toja Ortega et al, 2022; van Dijk et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, for all conditions, preferential selection for PAOs and GAOs will result from a duly operated anaerobic selector by managing the contact time between the influent wastewater and the biomass to enable hydrolysis, fermentation, and VFA uptake by these organisms prior to switching aeration or anoxic phases on. In granular sludge systems, this can occur via well-designed bed geometries and hydraulic conditions under slow up-flow feeding conditions, and/or by the integration of a subsequent anaerobic batch phase to promote the hydrolysis, fermentation, and uptake of VFAs by PAOs or GAOs (de Kreuk and van Loosdrecht, 2004; Weissbrodt et al, 2013b; Lochmatter and Holliger, 2014; Pronk et al, 2015b; Wagner et al, 2015; Derlon et al, 2016; Weissbrodt et al, 2017; Winkler et al, 2018; Toja Ortega et al, 2022; van Dijk et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison, smaller granules (0.5 mm) were relatively an excellent selection for minimizing N 2 O production at the appropriate DO level (e.g., 3.0 mg-O 2 /L) and lower NO 2 – contents. Generally, a range of granule diameters has been reported, varying from 0.2 to 3.0 mm. ,, Through efficient screening, smaller granules could be cultured in the full-scale AGS systems. For example, it is possible to establish a setup for periodic rapid screening in the mainstream AGS process to roughly sort out aerobic granules of various sizes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, a range of granule diameters has been reported, varying from 0.2 to 3.0 mm. 27,34,61 Through efficient screening, smaller granules could be cultured in the full-scale AGS systems. For example, it is possible to establish a setup for periodic rapid screening in the mainstream AGS process to roughly sort out aerobic granules of various sizes.…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%