2020
DOI: 10.5194/hess-2020-487
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrologically Informed Machine Learning for Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: Towards Distributed Modelling

Abstract: Abstract. Despite showing a great success of applications in many commercial fields, machine learning and data science models in general, show a limited use in scientific fields including hydrology. The approach is often criticized for lack of interpretability and physical consistency. This has led to the emergence of new paradigms, such as Theory Guided Data Science (TGDS) and physics informed machine learning. The motivation behind such approaches is to improve the physical meaningfulness of machine learning… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This setup permitted simultaneous training and simulation over thousands of sites or more. However, in many other machine learning studies, following the conventional wisdom of stratification, geoscientists still tend to train separate models using data from each site (Duan et al., 2020; Herath et al., 2021; Petty & Dhingra, 2018), or each region composed of sites with similar environmental conditions (Abdalla et al., 2021; Sahoo et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This setup permitted simultaneous training and simulation over thousands of sites or more. However, in many other machine learning studies, following the conventional wisdom of stratification, geoscientists still tend to train separate models using data from each site (Duan et al., 2020; Herath et al., 2021; Petty & Dhingra, 2018), or each region composed of sites with similar environmental conditions (Abdalla et al., 2021; Sahoo et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional rainfall runoff models face problems in the fact that they do not look in depth into the latest problems arising with the effects of change in land use and land cover owing to agricultural practices, forestry, pollution and toxic wastes released into water bodies (Elaji & Ji, 2020). To overcome this issue, physically-distributed models like the European Hydrological System -Systeme Hydrologique European or SHE model and IHDM deal effectively with the changes in land cover and land use or in drainage patterns in catchments (Herath et al, 2020).…”
Section: Rainfall and Runoff: Connected Components In The Hydrologica...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advanced approaches in flexible monitoring and prediction can be associated in recent decades with a powerful machine learning technique called Genetic Programming (GP) proposed as a modelling and forecasting tool, although a recent introduction to the field (Chadalawada et al, 2020;Herath et al, 2020). GP being a latest addition to a highly emerging sub field in computer science called Evolutionary Computation, works on the lines of its parent's theories.…”
Section: Rainfall and Runoff: Connected Components In The Hydrologica...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrological model has a more comprehensive physical foundation including lumped, grid-based, and fully distributed setups [18,19]. Not only the above physically-based models are used, but machine learning models are also widely applied in rainfall-runoff forecasting (i.e., artificial neural networks (ANNs) [20], support vector machines (SVM) [21], and the recent emergence of theory-guided data science (TGDS) [22,23]. For flood forecasting, which is affected by the discretization construction method, different construction expressions determine variations between heterogeneity analysis and model calculation structure, and further influence the accuracy of physical expressions in the prediction processes of the hydrological model [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%