2018
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrological niche segregation defines forest structure and drought tolerance strategies in a seasonal Amazon forest

Abstract: The relationship between rooting depth and above‐ground hydraulic traits can potentially define drought resistance strategies that are important in determining species distribution and coexistence in seasonal tropical forests, and understanding this is important for predicting the effects of future climate change in these ecosystems. We assessed the rooting depth of 12 dominant tree species (representing c. 42% of the forest basal area) in a seasonal Amazon forest using the stable isotope ratios (δ18O and δ2H)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
161
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(202 reference statements)
5
161
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study conducted in the TNF by Brum et al . () concluded that rooting depth, hydraulic stress resilience, and tree size all fell along a single niche axis, likely influencing the functional diversity of this seasonally dry forest. The results of our study suggest that phenological strategy may also be arrayed along this niche axis; in this case, the combination of high light, high VPD, and low soil moisture in short‐statured, shallow‐rooted, canopy surface trees could lead to faster or intensified leaf abscission or reduced leaf expansion and maturation in drought, or a higher prevalence of deciduousness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A recent study conducted in the TNF by Brum et al . () concluded that rooting depth, hydraulic stress resilience, and tree size all fell along a single niche axis, likely influencing the functional diversity of this seasonally dry forest. The results of our study suggest that phenological strategy may also be arrayed along this niche axis; in this case, the combination of high light, high VPD, and low soil moisture in short‐statured, shallow‐rooted, canopy surface trees could lead to faster or intensified leaf abscission or reduced leaf expansion and maturation in drought, or a higher prevalence of deciduousness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The work of Brum et al . () suggests that large trees are less tolerant of water stress, operating with small safety margins, such that when deep soil water is depleted the consequences may be severe; this helps reconcile short‐term resilience (deep soil water still present) with long‐term large tree drought die‐off. Intriguingly, Leitold et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, when stomata close to prevent water loss, this results in a difference between q s and q sat within the stomatal cavity, expected to be particularly pronounced during droughts. In this study, above-canopy air specific humidity (q a ) was used as a surrogate of q s in the site-level analysis since surface soil moisture is unlikely to be a suitable metric to characterize water stress of the Amazon where plants may take up water from very deep soil (Brum et al, 2018;Ivanov et al, 2012;Nepstad et al, 1994). In this study, above-canopy air specific humidity (q a ) was used as a surrogate of q s in the site-level analysis since surface soil moisture is unlikely to be a suitable metric to characterize water stress of the Amazon where plants may take up water from very deep soil (Brum et al, 2018;Ivanov et al, 2012;Nepstad et al, 1994).…”
Section: Geophysical Research Lettersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With basin‐wide drying and more frequent and severe droughts projected across Amazonia (Malhi et al ., ), it is critical to understand root‐to‐canopy structural and functional responses to water limitation. This is non‐trivial as understanding how forest structure, demography, and water and light availability interact to influence productivity requires a multi‐pronged approach (Leitold et al ., ; Brum et al ., ). As Smith et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%