2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrological effects of clear-cutting in a boreal forest – Snowpack dynamics, snowmelt and streamflow responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The somewhat steeper slopes in C34 than the other two catchments could contribute to the increase in runoff after clear-cutting (Kreutzweiser et al 2008). Furthermore, in boreal catchments, where a considerable part of annual runoff takes place in spring, there are large interannual variations in snowmelt and streamflow responses after clear-cutting, with some years showing an increased runoff and others showing no effect (Ide et al 2013;Schelker et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussion Differences Between Catchmentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The somewhat steeper slopes in C34 than the other two catchments could contribute to the increase in runoff after clear-cutting (Kreutzweiser et al 2008). Furthermore, in boreal catchments, where a considerable part of annual runoff takes place in spring, there are large interannual variations in snowmelt and streamflow responses after clear-cutting, with some years showing an increased runoff and others showing no effect (Ide et al 2013;Schelker et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussion Differences Between Catchmentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Clear-cutting can considerably change water and nutrient fluxes of forested catchments (Kreutzweiser et al 2008). The removal of trees reduces interception and transpiration, which, in turn, increase ground water levels, runoff, and peak flows (Lundin 1979;Bosch and Hewlett 1982;Rosén et al 1996;Sørensen et al 2009;Schelker et al 2013). Nutrients are susceptible to leaching after clear-cutting because nutrient uptake by vegetation is minor Palviainen et al 2005), large amounts of nutrients are released from logging residues (Palviainen et al 2004) and nitrification and mineralization in the soil may increase (Paavolainen and Smolander 1998;Smolander et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mentioned study also showed that burning and pine beetle impacts affect more peak flows than seasonal runoff volumes (by up to 25%). The effect of clear-cutting is documented by Schelker et al (2013) for a catchment in northern Sweden. They observed that the SWE increased after clear-cutting by 30%, snowmelt occurred earlier and spring flood runoff increased significantly in some years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these studies have identified immediate increases in runoff and sediment production (Bosch and Hewlett, 1982;Brown et al, 2005;Hibbert, 1983;Hornbeck et al, 1993;Sahin and Hall, 1996). However, in basins where water yield depends mainly on snow accumulation and melt, researchers have reported high variability and uncertainty tied to site-specific topography, forest structure and microclimatic conditions (Cline et al, 1977;Lundquist et al, 2013;Schelker et al, 2013;Stottlemyer and Troendle, 2001;Troendle and Reuss, 1997;Venkatarama, 2014;Woods et al, 2006). Multiple authors have found a direct relationship between thinning, snow interception reduction and ablation increase (Link and Marks, 1999;Lundquist et al, 2013;Varhola et al, 2010;Venkatarama, 2014).…”
Section: H a Moreno Et Al: Hydrologic Effects Of Forest Thinningmentioning
confidence: 99%