Hydrological challenges to groundwater trading: Lessons from south-west Western Australia

Abstract

Perth, Western Australia (pop. 1.6m) derives 60% of its public water supply from the Gnangara groundwater system (GGS). Horticulture, domestic self-supply, and municipal parks are other major consumers of GGS groundwater. The system supports important wetlands and groundwater-dependent ecosystems. Underlying approximately 2200km 2 of the Swan Coastal Plain, the GGS comprises several aquifer levels with partial interconnectivity. Supplies of GGS groundwater are under unprecedented stress, due to reduced recharge and increases in extraction. Stored reserves in the superficial aquifer fell by 700GL between 1979 and 2008. Over a similar period, annual extraction for public supply increased by more than 350% from the system overall. Some management areas are over-allocated by as much as 69%.One potential policy response is a trading scheme for groundwater use. There has been only limited trading between GGS irrigators. Design and implementation of a robust groundwater trading scheme faces hydrological and/or hydro-economic challenges, among others. Groundwater trading involves transfers of the right to extract water. The resulting potential for spatial (and temporal) redistribution of the impacts of extraction requires management. Impacts at the respective selling and buying locations may differ in scale and nature. Negative externalities from groundwater trading may be uncertain as well as not monetarily compensable.An ideal groundwater trading scheme would ensure that marginal costs from trades do not exceed marginal benefits, incorporating future effects and impacts on third-parties. If this condition could be met, all transactions would result in constant or improved overall welfare. This paper examines issues that could reduce public welfare if groundwater trading is not subject to well-designed governance arrangements that are appropriate to meeting the above condition. It also outlines some opportunities to address key risks within the design of a groundwater trading scheme. We present a number of challenges, focusing on those with hydrological bases and/or information requirements. These include the appropriate hydrological definition of the boundaries of a trading area, the establishment and defining of sustainable yield and consumptive pool, and the estimation of effects of extractions on ecosystems and human users. We suggest several possible design tools. A combination of sustainable extraction limits, trading rules, management areas, and/or exchange rates may enable a trading scheme to address the above goals

A coupled modeling framework for sustainable watershed management in transboundary river basins

“…The case study results for the Niger River basin presented here quantify these third-party impacts on agricultural production, hydropower generation and ecological performance. Quantification of the impacts, both positive and negative, of the actions of water users can help develop a shared understanding of the water system dynamics among stakeholders (Skurray et al, 2012). By offering a way to fully couple human and natural systems with several ecosystem services, with flexibility to incorporate varying levels of importance for heterogeneous users, the modeling framework presented here can be useful as a tool to stimulate cooperative water management in transboundary settings.…”

“…The decision-maker is usually assumed to possess perfect information with respect to demand and supply of water and other resources in the watershed. If they are considered at all, most ecological functions are considered as constraints in the system, often for numerical convenience and frequently leading to oversimplification (Stone-Jovicich, 2015).…”

Using a market-type allocation system to confront water scarcity: an inter-district approach in Greece

“…However, as state by Skurray et al (2012): "the larger the management area, the greater the theoretical potential for the concentration of impacts due to the spatial redistribution under trading". For this reason we limit our analysis at the sub-basin-level.…”

Controlling Groundwater Exploitation Through Economic Instruments: Current Practices, Challenges and Innovative Approaches

“…Such groundwater markets exist in several countries including the USA, Chile (see Sects. 22.4 and 22.5 of this chapter), Australia (Skurray et al 2012), China (Zhang et al 2008) and Spain (Garrido et al 2012), among others. The third approach is founded on the decentralization of water allocation policies and the devolution of a number of State responsibilities to Water Users Communities or Associations.…”