2015
DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrologic Effects of Surface Coal Mining in Appalachia (U.S.)

Abstract: Surface coal mining operations alter landscapes of the Appalachian Mountains, United States, by replacing bedrock with mine spoil, altering topography, removing native vegetation, and constructing mine soils with hydrologic properties that differ from those of native soils. Research has demonstrated hydrologic effects of mining and reclamation on Appalachian landscapes include increased peakflows at newly mined and reclaimed watersheds in response to strong storm events, increased subsurface void space, and in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Loblolly pine is more tolerant of poorly drained soils than shortleaf pine [37]. Large portions of the project site exhibited poor drainage and even standing water (which can frequently be the case on these sites [52,53]), suggesting that overall soil moisture conditions may be more favorable for loblolly pine than shortleaf pine. Chemically, soils were favorable across treatments, with pH, particle size distribution, nutrient levels, and CEC similar to those observed on soils favorable for tree growth and survival in another eastern Kentucky study [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loblolly pine is more tolerant of poorly drained soils than shortleaf pine [37]. Large portions of the project site exhibited poor drainage and even standing water (which can frequently be the case on these sites [52,53]), suggesting that overall soil moisture conditions may be more favorable for loblolly pine than shortleaf pine. Chemically, soils were favorable across treatments, with pH, particle size distribution, nutrient levels, and CEC similar to those observed on soils favorable for tree growth and survival in another eastern Kentucky study [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coal mining in the Appalachian region is environmentally destructive and has created serious ecological harms to local environment including hydrological impacts (Vengosh et al 2013;Evans et al 2015), polluting of surrounding streams and groundwater (McAuley & Kazor 2006;Lindberg et al 2011), reduced air quality (Aneja, Isherwood & Morgan 2012;Kruth et al 2014) and drastic changes in the topography of the land (Wickham et al 2013;Ross, McGlynn & Bernhardt 2016 There is evidence that air pollution, particularly particulate matter, is associated with neurodegenerative-related diseases and mortality (Kettunen et al 2007;Block & Calderon-Garciduenas 2009;Levesque et al 2011 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars find mountaintop removal (MTR)MTR coal mining to be highly destructive to the environment (Palmer et al 2010;Aneja, Isherwood & Morgan 2012;Vengosh et al 2013;Kruth et al 2014;Evans et al 2015) and is linked to negative health outcomes, including increased mortality rates and reduced self-rated health (Hitt & Hednryx 2010;Hendryx, Fedorko & Anesetti 2010;Zullig & Hendryx 2010;Zullig & Hendryx 2011). While acknowledging that the role of socioeconomic status on coal mining in the region remains important, socioeconomic status may not be the only mechanism through which coal mining affects the health and wellbeing of the Appalachian region.…”
Section: Natural Resource Curse and The Appalachian Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations