2014
DOI: 10.3133/ofr20141102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrologic data for the Obed River watershed, Tennessee

Abstract: For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS.For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprodTo order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In three (BISO, LIRI, OBRI) of these systems, lower cumulative contaminant detections and concentrations observed in tributary samples (BISO, OBRI only) than in primary-stream samples, comparable or decreasing cumulative detections and concentrations in downstream order in primary stream samples, combined with limited road access within the study reaches (except Leatherwood Ford, BISO) are consistent with fluvial inflows from upstream external sources, as suggested in other protected-area streams in the US (Battaglin et al, 2018;Bradley et al, 2017c;Elliott and VanderMeulen, 2017;Weissinger et al, 2018), Europe (Camacho-Muñoz et al, 2010), and Africa (Gerber et al, 2016). Likewise, the presence of wastewater sources, including private residential (septic) and municipal/community wastewater treatment facilities upstream of these systems (e.g., OBRI (Guyot, 2005;Knight et al, 2014)) and generally (median exposure conditions) lower detections and concentrations of pesticides (common landscape-derived, non-point contaminants) than pharmaceuticals (common wastewaterassociated, point-source contaminants) support the importance of fluvial inflows as contaminant sources to these three study reaches. Similarly, cumulative contaminant detections and concentrations in Wekiva River samples were comparable between upstream (WEKI-1) and downstream (WEKI-2) locations and generally higher than in the tributary (WEKI-3).…”
Section: Preliminary Contaminant Source Attributionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In three (BISO, LIRI, OBRI) of these systems, lower cumulative contaminant detections and concentrations observed in tributary samples (BISO, OBRI only) than in primary-stream samples, comparable or decreasing cumulative detections and concentrations in downstream order in primary stream samples, combined with limited road access within the study reaches (except Leatherwood Ford, BISO) are consistent with fluvial inflows from upstream external sources, as suggested in other protected-area streams in the US (Battaglin et al, 2018;Bradley et al, 2017c;Elliott and VanderMeulen, 2017;Weissinger et al, 2018), Europe (Camacho-Muñoz et al, 2010), and Africa (Gerber et al, 2016). Likewise, the presence of wastewater sources, including private residential (septic) and municipal/community wastewater treatment facilities upstream of these systems (e.g., OBRI (Guyot, 2005;Knight et al, 2014)) and generally (median exposure conditions) lower detections and concentrations of pesticides (common landscape-derived, non-point contaminants) than pharmaceuticals (common wastewaterassociated, point-source contaminants) support the importance of fluvial inflows as contaminant sources to these three study reaches. Similarly, cumulative contaminant detections and concentrations in Wekiva River samples were comparable between upstream (WEKI-1) and downstream (WEKI-2) locations and generally higher than in the tributary (WEKI-3).…”
Section: Preliminary Contaminant Source Attributionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Lake Holiday is a reservoir on the Obed River that supplies municipal water to the City of Crossville, Tennessee (0.059 m 3 /s average withdrawal in 2014). Downstream, the Crossville wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) releases treated effluent (0.096 m 3 /s annual average) into the Obed River [58,59]. In this system, effluent discharge exceeds upstream withdrawal because of an inter-basin transfer (IBT) from the Caney Fork River Basin into the Obed River Basin.…”
Section: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Municipal water withdrawals and effluent discharges are maintained the same as baseline. Figure 2C; 3 The reservoir in this system (Lake Holiday) currently does not provide a guaranteed minimum outflow to the Obed River [59]; 4 Water withdrawal from Lake Holiday for the City of Crossville, Tennessee, modeled over the period of record at the 2014 average annual rate [58]; 5 Effluent discharged from the Crossville wastewater treatment plant into the Obed River downstream of Lake Holiday, modeled over the period of record using the average annual rate reported by [59]; 6 x is reservoir storage for Lake Holiday in percent; y is percent of inflow to Lake Holiday released as outflow to the Obed River.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%