Hydrologic and geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange during base flow recession in a headwater mountain stream

Abstract

[1] Hyporheic hydrodynamics are a control on stream ecosystems, yet we lack a thorough understanding of catchment controls on these flow paths, including valley constraint and hydraulic gradients in the valley bottom. We performed four whole-stream solute tracer injections under steady state flow conditions at the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest (Oregon, United States) and collected electrical resistivity (ER) imaging to directly quantify the 2-D spatial extent of hyporheic exchange through seasonal base flow recession. ER images provide spatially distributed information that is unavailable for stream solute transport modeling studies from monitoring wells alone. The lateral and vertical extent of the hyporheic zone was quantified using both ER images and spatial moment analysis. Results oppose the common conceptual model of hyporheic ''compression'' by increased lateral hydraulic gradients toward the stream. We found that the extent of the hyporheic zone increased with decreasing vertical gradients away from the stream, in contrast to expectations from conceptual models. Increasing hyporheic extent was observed with both increasing and decreasing down-valley (i.e., parallel to the valley gradient) and cross-valley (i.e., from the hillslope to the stream, perpendicular to the valley gradient) hydraulic gradients. We conclude that neither cross-valley nor down-valley hydraulic gradients are sufficient predictors of hyporheic exchange flux nor flow path network extent. Increased knowledge of the controls on hyporheic exchange, the temporal dynamics of exchange flow paths, and their the spatial distribution is the first step toward predicting hyporheic exchange at the scale of individual flow paths. Future studies need to more carefully consider interactions between spatiotemporally dynamic hydraulic gradients and subsurface architecture as controls on hyporheic exchange.

Scaling down hyporheic exchange flows: from catchments to reaches

“…During low precipitation periods, some alluvial floodplains channels and wetlands are fed by hyporheic flows, and the magnitude of hyporheic exchange is related to the possibility of hyporheic flow to move down valley (Stanford and Ward, 1993). Ward et al (2012) reports both positive and negative relationships between hyporheic zone and down-valley gradients near hillslopes, suggesting that cross-valley and vertical hydraulic gradients control the HEF. Valley-floor morphology therefore drives hyporheic exchange in both high-and low-gradient streams.…”

“…infiltration) processes and hyporheic exchange flows (Dragoni and Sukhija, 2008). Hyporheic zones and flows have been observed to change seasonally in response to wetter and drier catchment cycles and associated groundwater fluctuations (Section 4.1) (Wondzell and Swanson, 1996;Storey et al, 2003;Ward et al, 2012;Voltz et al, 2013;Azinheira et 10 al., 2014;Malzone et al, 2015). However, because limited research has been conducted on this topic at catchment scale, we must infer possible connections to HEF from more general catchment hydrology studies.…”

“…Topographic roughness at all scales drive hyporheic exchange, causing nested flow paths (Worman et al, 2007;Cardenas, 2008;Buffington and Tonina, 2009;Ward et al, 2012) (Fig. 8).…”

“…CC-BY 3.0 License. gradients between the stream and the riparian water table (Hakenkamp et al, 1993;Vervier et al, 1992;White, 1993;Soulsby et al, 2001;Bhaskar et al, 2012;Ward et al, 2012;Malzone et al, 2015).…”

“…vegetation) (Section 4.5.1) (Poole et al, 2006;Wondzell, 2006; 5 Jones et al, 2008;Ward et al, 2012;Wondzell and Gooseff, 2013;.…”