2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrologic and erosion responses to compaction and added surface cover in post-fire logged areas: Isolating splash, interrill and rill erosion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparisons between years are not appropriate due to poor instrument reliability. Prats et al, 2012;Prats, Malvar, Coelho, & Wagenbrenner, 2019;Prats, Wagenbrenner, Martins, Malvar, & Keizer, 2016;Wagenbrenner et al, 2006). It is also notable that the James and Krumland (2018) study, similar to ours, occurred in a region dominated by sandy loam andisols derived from quaternary volcanic parent material, which can exhibit rapid infiltration (Jefferson, Grant, Lewis, & Lancaster, 2010), but also provide an abundance of loose, erodible materials with relatively low cohesion when slope-stabilizing vegetation is absent (Esposito et al, 2017;Rodriguez, Guerra, Gorrin, Arbelo, & Mora, 2002).…”
Section: Sediment Yieldssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Comparisons between years are not appropriate due to poor instrument reliability. Prats et al, 2012;Prats, Malvar, Coelho, & Wagenbrenner, 2019;Prats, Wagenbrenner, Martins, Malvar, & Keizer, 2016;Wagenbrenner et al, 2006). It is also notable that the James and Krumland (2018) study, similar to ours, occurred in a region dominated by sandy loam andisols derived from quaternary volcanic parent material, which can exhibit rapid infiltration (Jefferson, Grant, Lewis, & Lancaster, 2010), but also provide an abundance of loose, erodible materials with relatively low cohesion when slope-stabilizing vegetation is absent (Esposito et al, 2017;Rodriguez, Guerra, Gorrin, Arbelo, & Mora, 2002).…”
Section: Sediment Yieldssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The success of mulching in reducing soil erosion depends on the characteristics of the applied material, such as strand length, ground cover amount and thickness of the application (Robichaud et al, 2013b). Very different forest residue mulches have been tested, such as logging slash, wood shreds, wood strands, eucalypt or sequoia shredded barks (Fernández et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2008;Prats et al, 2014Prats et al, , 2019Robichaud et al, 2013a;Shakesby et al, 1996), but most of them were applied at high rates to be effective (8-34 Mg ha -1 ), especially when compared to the 2-3 Mg ha -1 of straw mulch (Badía and Martí, 2000;Wagenbrenner et al, 2006). Burroughs and King (1989) and Badía and Martí (2000) provide exponential negative equations to determine the mulch application rate needed to reach a certain ground cover percentage and a reduction in soil erosion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5b) and Galium aparine on unfenced, limed plots receiving nitrogen and phosphorus. Complex interactions such as this are likely to be much more frequent in nature than we know, as ecological field experiments involving factorial combinations of three or more treatments are still scarce (Prats et al 2019).…”
Section: Community-level Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%